Defense against the squeeze play...

[golferbrent]

I understand... no problem. If my description fits, and you would like just pm me, and we can talk offline.

Hey could you reply to my thread about LA? I am heading to LA in a couple of weeks and wanted to know when and where the best 20, 30, and 40 games were? Just wanted to get a lay of the land.

Also, curious about where to stay if you don't stay at commerce?

[mike l.]

youre using the incorrect usage of the term squeeze play. squeeze play is a raise or reraise usually on the turn with a weak hand where you knock out the best hand and get it heads up with a fish who is obviously drawing. your raise looks stronger since you are against two players, including usually a calling station (the fish).

i was going to post a hand that could have the same subject as your thread.

anyway given all that you should tell them both you are leaving the game and tell them why and never play short with them again.

[Garland]

[ QUOTE ]
I understand... no problem. If my description fits, and you would like just pm me, and we can talk offline.

Hey could you reply to my thread about LA? I am heading to LA in a couple of weeks and wanted to know when and where the best 20, 30, and 40 games were? Just wanted to get a lay of the land.

Also, curious about where to stay if you don't stay at commerce?

[/ QUOTE ]

I already replied. Check Brick and Mortar. Your original thread has been moved there.

Oh, and your description doesn't fit.

Garland

[Captain R]

[ QUOTE ]
They aren't doing the button raise/SB 3-bet thing every time it's folded to the button. They are at the very least selective about their cards, not playing "any two". In actuality, it has folded to button on several occasions, and button had elected to fold and then SB and myself agreed to chop.

[/ QUOTE ]

This sounds to me like they're not colluding then (in this way).

Anyway, if she's good, she probably will be repopping it if she decides to play when he raises on the button.