Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Brick and Mortar
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-27-2007, 10:36 PM
illmatic illmatic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 122
Default Chicago -- Resorts vs. Majestic Star 1/2 or 1/3 NL

Question -- going to be slumming it in Chicago this week. Which room is better for entry-level NL weekday nights? Do both rooms have autoshufflers? Thanks for any help.

later,
illmatic
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-27-2007, 11:14 PM
pjf1969 pjf1969 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 69
Default Re: Chicago -- Resorts vs. Majestic Star 1/2 or 1/3 NL

I take the 1/3 majestic any day. I only play the 1/2 when on the list to play the 20/40 LHE at resorts seems to have less money on the table and be alittle nitty there is always a 5/10 1000 max going where at majestic the 300max is the big game most of the time. There are almost always $1000 plus stacks on the table the resorts 1-2 not the case.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-27-2007, 11:58 PM
SMACK BOOTY SMACK  BOOTY is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hope is a bad hedge.
Posts: 242
Default Re: Chicago -- Resorts vs. Majestic Star 1/2 or 1/3 NL

I play both rooms frequently so I’ll take this question.
Both rooms are no smoking; both have bars close by so drink service is decent. Both rooms allow you to call in up to 1 hour ahead to go on the list- you need to take advantage of this to cut down on wait time. Both have about 20 tables. Dealers are about the same in both rooms , maybe a little bit better at MS. Chip cages in both rooms. Most tables have auto shufflers.

Resorts:
• Less space in between tables, room is much more cramped.
• Resorts has not kept the room up vs. Majestic Star. Room is a little more run down, but not terribly so.
• 1,2 buy in is 100 min/300 max, or 150 BB’s.
• More donkeys, which is fine as long as the donkeys aint hitting. If they hit, variance is a mother.
• Gotta go downstairs to get some decent food, but you can order some crappy sandwiches at the table.
• Resorts gears itself more toward the high limit players, so sometimes lower limit games are tougher to get on, but not a real bad problem.
• Has lost ground to MS over the last couple of years, fewer players, tables break up earlier late at night.

Majestic Star
• Much more room in between tables, room is bigger overall.
• Room is in much better shape, newer tables/carpets/flat screens
• 1,2 buy in 40 min/100 max (50 BB). This is the number one drawback with MS, the buy ins are screwed up. You can’t play poker, set mine, or bluff properly. Think about it; normal raise is 12-15 dollars; you raise preflop, a couple of fish call, and you’re pretty much pot committed with any c-bet. Too many hands become all in fests.
• Caters to lower limit players, generally more poker players in the room at a given time. Players are marginally better, but clearly beatable.
• Grill next to poker room, great sandwiches.
• Room is better run, has gained in business over the last two years vs Resorts.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-28-2007, 02:04 AM
illmatic illmatic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 122
Default Re: Chicago -- Resorts vs. Majestic Star 1/2 or 1/3 NL

Thanks for the input guys, you rock
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.