Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-04-2007, 09:30 AM
Fadook Fadook is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: giving you $$$
Posts: 753
Default TPGK faces aggro

Recently replaced a shorthanded table with FR in my multiabling routine, so I'm a little rusty.

Most of the hands I've played with CO have been shorthanded, where he's always seeed like a pretty decent player. Some occasionally misplaced aggession, but nothing too crazy. BTN is really loose and stupid.

.5/1 8-handed
Hero is UTG with K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]

Preflop: Hero raises, 3 folds, CO raises, BTN calls, 2 folds.

Flop: (10.5 SB) 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (3 players)
Hero checks, CO bets, BTN calls, Hero calls.

Turn (6.75 BB) 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (3 players)
Hero ?

Is this an obvious get to showdown as cheaply as possible?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-04-2007, 09:50 AM
sean c sean c is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,747
Default Re: TPGK faces aggro

Get to showdown cheaply. If the turn checks through bet the river. Betting here calling a raise and a river bet is donating money.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-04-2007, 10:24 AM
shadow. shadow. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Brighton
Posts: 5,689
Default Re: TPGK faces aggro

c/r flop. if 3-bet, fold the turn.

not exactly sure what button is doing...but you said that he's loose and stupid and thus he doesn't worry me that much. he got have a hand like 77 or 99.

we really need to find out if co has a hand that we beat (ak, jj, tt, 99) or whether we're up against a hand that crushes us (aa, kk, qq, aq). seems like combinatorically, it's in favor of us being ahead, but that's just a guess done in my head.

anyway, c/ring here will get us that info and value out of our strong hand against button, who is a moron, and against co when we're ahead and he can't let go (ie jj, tt) (also, ak will peel.)

holla
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-04-2007, 10:37 AM
KitCloudkicker KitCloudkicker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Nittiest LAG Ever
Posts: 2,366
Default Re: TPGK faces aggro

[ QUOTE ]

anyway, c/ring here will get us that info

[/ QUOTE ]

lol?

i thought aussie battler purged this "raise for info" from the micros for good? yet it still shows up? pls stop raising for info and pick a line that loses you least when behind wins you the most when ahead.

you cant raise for info here. any info you get is not 100% reliable and if you have 5 outs it would be bad to fold until the river anyway.

in this spot c/c 3 times or c/c twice and b/f the river are both fine.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-04-2007, 10:41 AM
sean c sean c is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,747
Default Re: TPGK faces aggro

[ QUOTE ]
c/r flop. if 3-bet, fold the turn.

not exactly sure what button is doing...but you said that he's loose and stupid and thus he doesn't worry me that much. he got have a hand like 77 or 99.

we really need to find out if co has a hand that we beat (ak, jj, tt, 99) or whether we're up against a hand that crushes us (aa, kk, qq, aq). seems like combinatorically, it's in favor of us being ahead, but that's just a guess done in my head.

anyway, c/ring here will get us that info and value out of our strong hand against button, who is a moron, and against co when we're ahead and he can't let go (ie jj, tt) (also, ak will peel.)

holla

[/ QUOTE ]

wow great post shadow.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-04-2007, 10:44 AM
shadow. shadow. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Brighton
Posts: 5,689
Default Re: TPGK faces aggro

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

anyway, c/ring here will get us that info

[/ QUOTE ]

lol?

i thought aussie battler purged this "raise for info" from the micros for good? yet it still shows up?

[/ QUOTE ]

i knew that i was going to get this response. don't be mistaken, when you act, you get information. with each action that you take, you get more information. acting PURELY for information is a losing play. taking an action that will allow you to lose the least when you're behind and gain the most when you're ahead BECAUSE of additional information is a strong, winning play. like the one i advocate.

[ QUOTE ]
pls stop raising for info and pick a line that loses you least when behind wins you the most when ahead.

[/ QUOTE ]

lose the least- c/r, call 3-bet. c/f turn. 1.5 bets. c/c,c/c,c/c (or b/f)- lose 2.5 bets. that's 1 bet. that's a huge difference in terms of winning vs. losing poker.

gain the most- c/r, opponent calls. that's 1 bet right there. depending on his hand, you're either going to get 3 or 2 or 1. weight the hand ranges and i think that you'll average a little over 2 bets. granted, that's a little less than c/c, c/c, c/c suggests. but if you're ahead, then he's likely not to bet the river. so in truth, they're about equal (most of the time).

but what distinguishes my play is that BECAUSE of more information, you're able to lose a significant amount less than blindly allowing your opponent to control the initiative and hand dynamic.

[ QUOTE ]
you cant raise for info here. any info you get is not 100% reliable and if you have 5 outs it would be bad to fold until the river anyway.

[/ QUOTE ]

i think a c/r getting 3-bet here by a pf 3-bettor is pretty reliable. of course, not everything in poker is 100%. but that's a pretty damn strong signal.

holla
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-04-2007, 11:48 AM
Fadook Fadook is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: giving you $$$
Posts: 753
Default Re: TPGK faces aggro

[ QUOTE ]
lose the least- c/r, call 3-bet. c/f turn. 1.5 bets. c/c,c/c,c/c (or b/f)- lose 2.5 bets. that's 1 bet. that's a huge difference in terms of winning vs. losing poker.

gain the most- c/r, opponent calls. that's 1 bet right there. depending on his hand, you're either going to get 3 or 2 or 1. weight the hand ranges and i think that you'll average a little over 2 bets. granted, that's a little less than c/c, c/c, c/c suggests. but if you're ahead, then he's likely not to bet the river. so in truth, they're about equal (most of the time).

but what distinguishes my play is that BECAUSE of more information, you're able to lose a significant amount less than blindly allowing your opponent to control the initiative and hand dynamic.

i think a c/r getting 3-bet here by a pf 3-bettor is pretty reliable. of course, not everything in poker is 100%. but that's a pretty damn strong signal.


[/ QUOTE ]

I like this a lot. I've often thought about how calling down can be an expensive way to confirm that you are actually behind. In this situation, if CO 3-bets after I c-r the flop, I can pretty safely assume that I'm well behind. I'm clearly representing at least TPGK, and he doesn't care. Giving myself a full 5 outs would be bad, so even though the pot could be 9.5 BB on the turn, I can still fold safely. And as shadow said, if I do have the best hand I'm getting max value out of BTN.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-04-2007, 12:44 PM
Caffeinated Caffeinated is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 12
Default Re: TPGK faces aggro

Would folding pre-flop be considered to tight of an action?

I suppose I have been tossing hands like this away if it was early and not suited and wondering if that is possibly a mistake on my part? (playing .25/.5)

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-04-2007, 01:47 PM
Fadook Fadook is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: giving you $$$
Posts: 753
Default Re: TPGK faces aggro

Folding pf is definitely too tight. This is a standard raise.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-04-2007, 03:33 PM
Sushiglutton Sushiglutton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Searching for fish
Posts: 2,048
Default Re: TPGK faces aggro

[ QUOTE ]
i think a c/r getting 3-bet here by a pf 3-bettor is pretty reliable. of course, not everything in poker is 100%. but that's a pretty damn strong signal.

[/ QUOTE ]

In theory (at least) CO may 3-bet JJ-99, AK, maybe for info maybe to get a cheap show-down, protect agaisnt BTN thinking we are weakish or whatever reason he may have. How often does he need to do this before CR/fold turn UI if 3-bet becomes a loser?

What I want to know is if you have analyzed how certain we need to be (95%, 90%, 80%, or something else?) we are beaten before the line u suggested becoes correct.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.