AP thread 87.1 - waiting on the statement ITT - Page 13

bronx bomber · #**121** 10-20-2007, 08:56 PM

In an unrelated press release, the KGC has announced that it has hired two respected internet operators onboard to assist in the enforcement of fraud. There names are.......

mshafer000 · #**122** 10-20-2007, 08:57 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Two people will be implicated here, you can probably guess who. One is going to be removed from online poker forever and one is going be removed for a fair amount of time.

[/ QUOTE ]

N,

Clearly they are not talking about implicating Scott. I say this because not even 2 hours ago they were saying he was innocent. Is this true, or have I missed something??

PartyGirlUK · #**123** 10-20-2007, 08:58 PM

Seems from the A7 v. KK hand that he didnt have superpowers.

adanthar · #**124** 10-20-2007, 08:58 PM

Re: Oscar: first hand very suspicious, second hand looks exactly like a sat donkey and 0% like a superuser. got more?

R*R · #**125** 10-20-2007, 08:58 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Unlike what El D posted, the two people are very high up at AP. And good friends. Read between the lines.

[/ QUOTE ]

so are we warm or are we hot?

adanthar · #**126** 10-20-2007, 08:59 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Unlike what El D posted, the two people are very high up at AP. And good friends. Read between the lines.

[/ QUOTE ]

so are we warm or are we hot?

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't actually know anything right now and have 0% inside information on this, so I'm going to go ahead and *guess* smoking

jcsmitty22 · #**127** 10-20-2007, 09:01 PM

I wishhh i had more, but isnt it true on stars that the KK would not be able to reraise there???? the all-in was not a full raise... perhaps thats what he thought owuld happen and since he had 80k to throw around and knew he was live and wanted to end people as quickly as possible ( potrippers MO also) i dunno there is definately room for skepticism but can there rly be THIS many coincidences???? I wish there were more hands to see... someone get ahead of a final table person cuz this was as far as he would let me go

pothead · #**128** 10-20-2007, 09:01 PM

[ QUOTE ]
If one were using GoToMyPC to remotely access a computer at Scott Tom's house, or anwhere else, actions performed by the remotely accessed PC would have the IP of that PC, not the PC initiating the GoToMyPC session.

[/ QUOTE ]
I would think you need to access the computer to install GoToMyPC, so I would be more inclined to believe in some sort of trojan that could be implanted remotely.

The whole idea seems very far fetched though.
Making a scam for that kind of money and as an extra touch plant evidence that points to the CEO that you hope that some eventual auditor finds?
Sounds like quite an advanced scheme.

El Diablo · #**129** 10-20-2007, 09:03 PM

N,

The whole thing is a joke. Just need to match AP responses to info posted on 2+2 to see how comical the timeline is for them finding information.

<xxxx>

"No, didn't happen, impossible, everything has been checked!"

<xxxx>

"Wait, yes it did happen, but by employee doing it as test!"

<xxxx>

"Oh, two key people at Absolute involved!"

while somewhere in Costa Rica or Panama:

yo fool
fyi, you no longer work for us
LOL,OK!
OK!
MARGARITAS, BABY!!!!!
LET'S HIT THE YACHT!
TIME FOR SOME PANAMANIAN HOTTIES!!!!

adanthar · #**130** 10-20-2007, 09:03 PM

[ QUOTE ]
I wishhh i had more, but isnt it true on stars that the KK would not be able to reraise there???? the all-in was not a full raise... perhaps thats what he thought owuld happen and since he had 80k to throw around

[/ QUOTE ]

he isn't even in first place at his table.

scratch this, he's got about a 98% chance of being innocent here based off that one hand alone.