Party Regs Thread - Page 49

Melchiades · #**481** 09-05-2007, 07:19 AM

Michaelson,

I have this problem as well.

Daddy Warbucks · #**482** 09-05-2007, 07:44 AM

Do people still think Party > everywhere else? I've been thinking of moving to full tilt ever since party took away rakeback.

cowboy billy · #**483** 09-05-2007, 07:56 AM

I'm playing on Empire bc of a bonus I completed there, are there any benefits to moving to Party? (I have an old account there)

does Party offer reload bonusses or something?

Rainclouds · #**484** 09-05-2007, 08:10 AM

[ QUOTE ]
WTF is this? Probably 50% of the time when I close party I get this message then the program opens up again. I think, but I'm not sure, that my notes from those sessions are lost. Anyone else get this?

[/ QUOTE ]
I even had this a couple of times while playing. Very frustrating when you're involved in big hands.

It's a simple memory leak by the way; some crappy programmer did not correctly allocate or free some memory space for a variable. Any decent programmer can avoid this from happening, and it's so easy to fix. Yet the multi billion dollar company doesn't seem to be able to do that, so sad.

Melchiades · #**485** 09-05-2007, 08:16 AM

[ QUOTE ]
It's a simple memory leak by the way; some crappy programmer did not correctly allocate or free some memory space for a variable. Any decent programmer can avoid this from happening, and it's so easy to fix. Yet the multi billion dollar company doesn't seem to be able to do that, so sad.

[/ QUOTE ]
My blood always starts to boil when I start thinking about this. Party make an absolute killing, why they can't put out a bug free and stable client is a [censored] joke. It's not a very complex product.

Oki-Oki · #**486** 09-05-2007, 08:19 AM

[ QUOTE ]
I'm playing on Empire bc of a bonus I completed there, are there any benefits to moving to Party? (I have an old account there)

does Party offer reload bonusses or something?

[/ QUOTE ]

They do infrequently but they changed the clearance rates now they are often near impossible to get done in the time limit.

Womble · #**487** 09-05-2007, 08:30 AM

Ive seen you toeswinger quite a bit and you havent done anything remarkable so I guess you dont spew much - that being said you may be too easy to read

Michaelson · #**488** 09-05-2007, 08:50 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Brownstone87 one of you guys? Seems pretty solid.

[/ QUOTE ]

You saw him at 200nl? I was playing 400nl with him a week or two ago I think. He didn't really seem that great to me, but solid for sure.

[/ QUOTE ]

Fair enough, I only have 1000 or so hands on him, he just seems to apply a lot more pressure to the regulars than most. It could also be a case of solid at 400nl = dominant at 200nl.

CSKJ · #**489** 09-05-2007, 09:09 AM

Hell no, I think there are a lot of other sites where the nl200 is softer than party, but software/trafic not as great.

Fingerswinger · #**490** 09-05-2007, 09:26 AM

[ QUOTE ]
Ive seen you toeswinger quite a bit and you havent done anything remarkable so I guess you dont spew much - that being said you may be too easy to read

[/ QUOTE ]

easy to read: is that just a guess or your opinion?

i think i will take unknown soldiers advice and make a video. even if it means that then every solid player can exploit the [censored] out of me [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]