|
|
#12
09-17-2007, 12:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/4 Set on a 4-inside straight board
Turn bet was to make it look like I was just trying to take it down on the flop and that I wanted to steal it small on the turn as well as preparing for stacks on the river.
|
|
#13
09-17-2007, 03:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2/4 Set on a 4-inside straight board
[ QUOTE ]
Turn bet was to make it look like I was just trying to take it down on the flop and that I wanted to steal it small on the turn as well as preparing for stacks on the river. [/ QUOTE ] What would you do if he check-raises allin on turn? What's your river plan if a spade hits?
|
|
#14
09-17-2007, 07:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2/4 Set on a 4-inside straight board
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Turn bet was to make it look like I was just trying to take it down on the flop and that I wanted to steal it small on the turn as well as preparing for stacks on the river. [/ QUOTE ] What would you do if he check-raises allin on turn? What's your river plan if a spade hits? [/ QUOTE ] Call and call. I considered folding the river because I couldn't realistically find a hand I beat (well, there are over-pockets)...but I couldn't justifiably fold.
|
|
#15
09-18-2007, 01:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2/4 Set on a 4-inside straight board
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Turn bet was to make it look like I was just trying to take it down on the flop and that I wanted to steal it small on the turn as well as preparing for stacks on the river. [/ QUOTE ] What would you do if he check-raises allin on turn? What's your river plan if a spade hits? [/ QUOTE ] Call and call. I considered folding the river because I couldn't realistically find a hand I beat (well, there are over-pockets)...but I couldn't justifiably fold. [/ QUOTE ] Betting 150 makes it impossible for villain to profitably call with a flush draw. And of course you'll get the odds to draw if he has 44 and c/r's you on turn.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
