Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Student Life
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-13-2007, 10:04 PM
pnazari pnazari is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 550
Default Re: calc 1 vs calc 2 vs calc 3

Calc II required a little more effort (fu taylor series) than calc I but still pretty easy. Calc I was probably the easiest course ive taken so far in college, maybe that will change after this anthrop course im set to take 1st semester.

Also thinking about taking calc III as an elective next year but its been 2 years since calc I and i cant remember anything except the derivative of x^2=2x...maybe ill pass on the calc III.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-13-2007, 11:31 PM
CheckRaise CheckRaise is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 2,271
Default Re: calc 1 vs calc 2 vs calc 3

Calc II was the hardest for me but unlike you guys I found series and sequences to be the easiest part of the class. I had trouble with some of the integral stuff.

Edit:
This is off track but I need to take one more elective after the upcoming semester to complete my math minor and I was wondering what classes use the series stuff. I thought the Calc II stuff was kind of interesting but I don't know if there are any classes that specialize in that kind of stuff.

Maybe Real Analysis?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-13-2007, 11:35 PM
Unoriginalname Unoriginalname is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 705
Default Re: calc 1 vs calc 2 vs calc 3

I found them progressively harder, which seems to put me in the minority. Calc I was cake. I took it in high school, slept through most of the classes and got a 5 on the AP test. Calc II was a little harder, but still not too bad. I second the guy who said "[censored] the Taylor series" though.

I hated Calc III. But it might be because of my professor. I had the worst. professor. EVER. Here was his teaching style: He'd give you a homework assignment for something he didn't teach you yet. He would collect it the following class. [censored] grade it. And then in that class teach you how to do it. This is not an exaggeration. I mean this completely literally. He honestly taught us how to do stuff after a graded homework assignment. My grades were mediocre at best, but I got an A anyways. Never underestimate the power of the curve.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-14-2007, 12:29 AM
jamzfive jamzfive is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 181
Default Re: calc 1 vs calc 2 vs calc 3

I was a double math and compsci major in college. I took calc I in HS, and it was a breeze. Got a 5 on the AP exam. Semi-brag, but I mention it mostly to point out that I didn't suck at math.

I found Calc II interminably boring. Not as much real calculus as series, etc. I called it "approximations of calculus". Lots of summing rectangles and triangles.

Calc III was hell. Once I got out of 2 dimensions, I lost all ability to "see" what I was doing. It was around this time I decided to focus more on the compsci, and less on the math. Spatial visualization is a good skill to have for calc III.

Don't get me started on complex analysis. 4 dimensions?? I wanted to die. As Unoriginalname pointed out, never underestimate the power of the curve.

jb
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-14-2007, 12:58 AM
tshort tshort is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,143
Default Re: calc 1 vs calc 2 vs calc 3

[ QUOTE ]
Calc II was the hardest for me but unlike you guys I found series and sequences to be the easiest part of the class. I had trouble with some of the integral stuff.

Edit:
This is off track but I need to take one more elective after the upcoming semester to complete my math minor and I was wondering what classes use the series stuff. I thought the Calc II stuff was kind of interesting but I don't know if there are any classes that specialize in that kind of stuff.

Maybe Real Analysis?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes. A course in real analysis will spend a great deal of time covering sequences / series. Typically real analysis is one of the tougher undergraduate math courses.

What's your major?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-14-2007, 10:18 AM
jupiterpig jupiterpig is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: NCSU Forecasting Lab
Posts: 846
Default Re: calc 1 vs calc 2 vs calc 3

calc 1 = durrrrr
calc 2 = hard as [censored]
calc 3 = easy b/c i had a funny asian man who did not really grade with a purpose...just gave B's or higher...so no help on this one
Diff EQ = hard as calc 2, but made more sense
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-14-2007, 12:19 PM
Josh11 Josh11 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: UIUC
Posts: 555
Default Re: calc 1 vs calc 2 vs calc 3

[ QUOTE ]
Calc II was the hardest for me but unlike you guys I found series and sequences to be the easiest part of the class. I had trouble with some of the integral stuff.

[/ QUOTE ]

And for Calc III I took a Mathematica based course. I did not learn a thing and made an easy A, so I cannot give a real opinion on that one.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-14-2007, 05:25 PM
CheckRaise CheckRaise is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 2,271
Default Re: calc 1 vs calc 2 vs calc 3

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Calc II was the hardest for me but unlike you guys I found series and sequences to be the easiest part of the class. I had trouble with some of the integral stuff.

Edit:
This is off track but I need to take one more elective after the upcoming semester to complete my math minor and I was wondering what classes use the series stuff. I thought the Calc II stuff was kind of interesting but I don't know if there are any classes that specialize in that kind of stuff.

Maybe Real Analysis?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes. A course in real analysis will spend a great deal of time covering sequences / series. Typically real analysis is one of the tougher undergraduate math courses.

What's your major?

[/ QUOTE ]
I'm a chem major. If Real Analysis is a really difficult class I'm staying away from it because I've already got enough [censored] on the chem side to worry about. I just figured that since I breezed through the sequence/series stuff in Calc II that a class focusing on them wouldn't be too difficult.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-14-2007, 06:38 PM
jd2b2006 jd2b2006 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UF....still
Posts: 388
Default Re: calc 1 vs calc 2 vs calc 3

In terms of difficulty:

Calc 2 >>>> Calc 3 >> Calc 1
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-23-2007, 06:30 PM
thedustbustr thedustbustr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,556
Default Re: calc 1 vs calc 2 vs calc 3

calc 2 is mostly memorization.

calc 1 is derivative concepts and applications, very easy, plus it is taught at retard level to keep the gpas high

calc 3 is taught at a higher level but it is all concepts and no memorization.

if you are a typical smart lazy kid, calc 2 sucks ass, the rest are easy peazy.

if you had to work your ass off to get an a in calc 1, you will probably do very well with less work in calc 2, and you will be horrible at calc 3 (but you probably wont have to take it).
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.