|
|
#41
12-01-2007, 07:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party Poker is up to Something ... which D$D has inside scoop on
It's ridiculous to say that Party had worst software and SNG structure just because you didn't like it. IMO, their software is no worse than Stars and they must have ironed out a lot more things by now. SNG structure, you can debate all you want, but it was very similar to what Stars has and it's just nit picking.
Overall, PP coming to US is certainly a good thing. It might even cause Stars offering more benefits for players. 
|
|
#42
12-01-2007, 07:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party Poker is up to Something ... which D$D has inside scoop on
[ QUOTE ]
Overall, PP coming to US is certainly a good thing. It might even cause Stars offering more benefits for players. [/ QUOTE ] More competition in any form for US players has to be good for the individual players! D$D
|
|
#43
12-01-2007, 07:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party Poker is up to Something ... which D$D has inside scoop on
Im not saying it was the worst, just that it wasn't the best.
My inner nit didnt like some things, sure, but I played Party straight up once in a while. Stars and to an extent UB ran much smoother to me. D$D describes himself as a small winning recreational player. Id think ambience, software, and favorable structures would be more important to him. All I care about Party for is to pump [censored] of cash into the poker world. If I deem my time has more EV selecting their offerings, Ill take it. I spent a LOT of time at sites I loathed for the the earnings, and with Party gone, those earnigns suck.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
