Newest Cardplayer Details AP Scandal. Except For-

[David Sklansky]

the fact that the management continually denied that the hand history evidence proved anything. (They left that part out in spite of the fact that they, Cardplayer, characterized that evidence as indisputable.) Thus the aspect of the case that I thought was most important, they thought was not even important enough to mention. I mean there is no other explanation for that ommission is there?

[hoyasaxa]

none

[ebepse]

2nd

well, i am in agreement with you but what you have to consider in this situatidgoadaAhhaa fdaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhh asperrgers aatttackfhelp fdf fm

[btmagnetw]

david, consider starting more threads about this. the huge gaps in between the ones you have already started make it difficult for us to follow the story.

[ImsaKidd]

David the number of AP threads you have started is beginning to approach the number of times Brandi has had POB.

[ike]

Are you kidding? Cardplayer is a joke. Its advertising cover to cover, reporting doesn't enter into the equation. They didn't report the most damning aspect of the story because the advertisers who fund them would prefer they not do so.

[holdme]

[img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]

[LiveNow]

[censored], shouldn't have bet that david would only make one post on the AP issue. He binges.

[PoorSkillz]

What'$ funny i$ that Ab$olute Poker doe$n't $eem to believe that it i$ really important to mention it either.

Mr. $klan$y, I have no idea why this could be.

[tufat23]

mason needs to put the muzzle back on.