Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #111  
Old 11-20-2007, 04:45 PM
InTheDark InTheDark is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 207
Default Re: my solution to the gay marriage argument

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Why don't the polygamists have the same rights as gays? Who are we to deny those 3, 4, 5, or 30 people the right to a legal marriage and all of the benefits?

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd like to marry my stapler. Can you work that one in too?

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't see why not.

[/ QUOTE ]

Did I say 'stapler'? I meant sister.
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old 11-20-2007, 04:48 PM
Case Closed Case Closed is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: just how dangerous is it for a pot to hold ice?
Posts: 7,298
Default Re: my solution to the gay marriage argument

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Why don't the polygamists have the same rights as gays? Who are we to deny those 3, 4, 5, or 30 people the right to a legal marriage and all of the benefits?

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd like to marry my stapler. Can you work that one in too?

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't see why not.

[/ QUOTE ]

Did I say 'stapler'? I meant sister.

[/ QUOTE ]
Do it to it hombre. As long as she is not being forced to do it go right ahead.
Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old 11-20-2007, 04:49 PM
NeBlis NeBlis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 649
Default Re: my solution to the gay marriage argument

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Why don't the polygamists have the same rights as gays? Who are we to deny those 3, 4, 5, or 30 people the right to a legal marriage and all of the benefits?

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd like to marry my stapler. Can you work that one in too?

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't see why not.

[/ QUOTE ]

Did I say 'stapler'? I meant sister.

[/ QUOTE ]

Do what you want there Arkansas.
Reply With Quote
  #114  
Old 11-20-2007, 05:00 PM
Inso0 Inso0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 279
Default Re: my solution to the gay marriage argument

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I stated that I can not give custody of my child to my life partner if I die even though we are both raising it. Legally my life partner is some random dude. The government is tearing apart my family because of my death. It's quite sad that the fear irrational of gays can cause this.

[/ QUOTE ]

Are you seriously going to sit here and tell me that if you die, the government isn't going to allow you to grand custody of your child to whoever the hell you want, as long as that other party agrees?

Are you leveling me again?

[/ QUOTE ]
Link to about.com stuff
[ QUOTE ]
What happens if children in gay and lesbian couple households can't be adopted (or the parents aren't granted legal custody)?

* By banning gay adoption, children in gay couple households have no legal status should something happen to the parents, including death or serious illness.


* Neither the parent or child has visitation rights if the parents separate.


* The child cannot claim inheritances or other household assets in case of death.


* If one parent dies, the second parent has no legal right to take custody or care for the child.


* A parent without legal right to a child cannot legally register him/her for school.


* Parents cannot put children on some health insurance plans.


* Parents cannot make medical decisions for the child.


* The child has no claim to the social security or other insurance benefits of the parent.


* Gay couple parents without adoption rights do not benefit from the generous tax deductions granted to heterosexual parents.


[/ QUOTE ]
Yup, there it is. If they were allowed to be legally married, this stuff would not be a problem.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sorry, but this applies to heterosexual couples as well. If you're not the legal guardian of the child, you have none of these rights.

They don't say "Well, we WERE going to let you make these decisions for this kid whom you are not the legal guardian of, but we found out you're gay, so instead we're going to steal him from you."

If you are the legal guardian of a child, you can grant guardianship to whoever you want when you die.
Reply With Quote
  #115  
Old 11-20-2007, 05:07 PM
jogsxyz jogsxyz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,167
Default Re: my solution to the gay marriage argument

[ QUOTE ]
If this happened, I would immediately become civilly united with some poor college student or homeless person so I could save a ton on my taxes. And so would every other single person.

[/ QUOTE ]

You better not. That homeless person would divorce you and take half your assets.
Reply With Quote
  #116  
Old 11-20-2007, 05:07 PM
Inso0 Inso0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 279
Default Re: my solution to the gay marriage argument

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If this happened, I would immediately become civilly united with some poor college student or homeless person so I could save a ton on my taxes. And so would every other single person.

[/ QUOTE ]

You better not. That homeless person would divorce you and take half your assets.

[/ QUOTE ]

Prenup 4tw
Reply With Quote
  #117  
Old 11-20-2007, 05:13 PM
jogsxyz jogsxyz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,167
Default Re: my solution to the gay marriage argument

[ QUOTE ]


Prenup 4tw

[/ QUOTE ]

You better remember to provide the homeless person with an independent attorney, else the prenup will be declared invalid.
Reply With Quote
  #118  
Old 11-20-2007, 05:48 PM
kurto kurto is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: in your heart
Posts: 6,777
Default Re: my solution to the gay marriage argument

[ QUOTE ]
Sorry, but this applies to heterosexual couples as well. If you're not the legal guardian of the child, you have none of these rights.


[/ QUOTE ]

Hetero married couples can adopt a child together. Then all these problems go away.

He's saying that, with gay couples, only ONE of the parents can have guardianship. The other person in the relationship has no legal rights. So, though both parents may raise the adopted child, if the part with guardianship has a problem (say... gets killed in a car crash), the other 'parent' has no rights.

More importantly, you still have supplied no compelling reason why gay couples should not be allowed to marry.

Can we just skip to the end where you say its against your religious beliefs so you don't want gays to marry? That seems to be where these threads always end up.
Reply With Quote
  #119  
Old 11-20-2007, 06:43 PM
Inso0 Inso0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 279
Default Re: my solution to the gay marriage argument

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Sorry, but this applies to heterosexual couples as well. If you're not the legal guardian of the child, you have none of these rights.


[/ QUOTE ]

Hetero married couples can adopt a child together. Then all these problems go away.

He's saying that, with gay couples, only ONE of the parents can have guardianship. The other person in the relationship has no legal rights. So, though both parents may raise the adopted child, if the part with guardianship has a problem (say... gets killed in a car crash), the other 'parent' has no rights.

More importantly, you still have supplied no compelling reason why gay couples should not be allowed to marry.

Can we just skip to the end where you say its against your religious beliefs so you don't want gays to marry? That seems to be where these threads always end up.

[/ QUOTE ]

The guardian simply names their partner as the child's guardian should anything ever happen to them.

Why is this so difficult for you to understand?

The gay mommy/daddy already has a means to this end, why get the government involved in yet another aspect of people's private lives?
Reply With Quote
  #120  
Old 11-20-2007, 06:53 PM
kurto kurto is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: in your heart
Posts: 6,777
Default Re: my solution to the gay marriage argument

again... you fail to give any compelling reason why a gay couple shouldn't marry.

I have listed dozens of benefits that are easily gained through marriage. You're trying to list other ways gays can get some or all of the rights. Why should they have to find other ways? A way has already been created to get all these rights and benefits... its a legal contract called marriage.

If you remove the objections of the people wanting to legislate via their religion, you don't really have any compelling reason to deny gays the right to marry.

If you think the government shouldn't be involved in marriage then you can certainly argue for the abolishment of marriage and its benefits. But since you're not, you need to provide a compelling reason why you want to deny some tax paying americans rights you want to grant others.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.