|
|
#1
11-20-2007, 05:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Is this too weak? (NLTRN)
This was on eof the first hands of the session, so I had no reads. His check on the flop and small turn bet screams weakness, should I have raised him up here?
Poker Stars, $55 + $2.50 NL Hold'em Tournament, 10/20 Blinds, 2 Players LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter BB: 1,610 Hero (SB): 1,390 Pre-Flop: (30) Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (SB) <font color="red">Hero raises to 60</font>, <font color="red">BB raises to 160</font>, Hero calls 100 Flop: (320) 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 Players) BB checks, Hero checks Turn: (320) J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players) <font color="red">BB bets 100</font>, Hero folds Results: 320 Pot BB mucked and WON 320 (+160 NET) 
|
|
#4
11-20-2007, 05:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is this too weak? (NLTRN)
What had he been doing preflop the previous few hands?
Completely readless, I'd expect him to be on a medium pocket pair a lot of the time, A8+ occasionally (skewed to the bigger aces), and flush draws pretty rarely. I think the problem with a raise here is that you won't get a lot of credit after calling the PF 3bet and checking behind the flop; and if he calls the raise, I can't think of too many rivers that are good to bet at. In my mind that makes this a good fold. The alternative play, perhaps, is to flatcall the turn and try to take it away on a good scare card on the river - I'm not super comfortable with that either though. I like the fold.
|
|
#6
11-20-2007, 07:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is this too weak? (NLTRN)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] and youre probably behind anyway [/ QUOTE ] This is not an argument. When I raise here, it's solely as a bluff. It doesn't matter if I'm ahead or behind. [/ QUOTE ] you read the first half of that sentence right? the bit where i said i didnt really see him folding . . .
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
