5K to Deposit so is it FT or Stars?

[primate]

I play $1/2 6maxnl, 19k hands a month.

Which is better/softer, offering better RB/points for cash etc? I play 19k hands a month on average and bored with Party.

[questions]

FT is softer, though Stars' point scheme is prob a deal as good as FT's RB.

[a nonymous]

If you can play Party, you shouldn't play FT or Stars if you are care about how soft your games are. If you don't care about making money, I'd suggest Stars as they have better software.

[drunk.hole]

FT rakeback is great.

[Greg Miller]

[ QUOTE ]
I play $1/2 6maxnl, 19k hands a month.

Which is better/softer, offering better RB/points for cash etc? I play 19k hands a month on average and bored with Party.

[/ QUOTE ]

That should be approximately enough for SuperNova, in which case Stars VIP is better than FTP rakeback without bonus over the long run.

Of course, you have to make and maintain SuperNova first, which will take a number of months. And FTP will be better when you have bonus to clear.

[JSmith2007]

I think FTP to begin with as you get the initial rakeback and bonus.

Probably after say..2-3 months you should have enough to transfer/put on Stars of which you can then go with Stars VIP system and get Supernova which is probably better than FTP in the long run.