Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-12-2006, 10:11 PM
RakeBackDepot RakeBackDepot is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 20
Default Re: Correct play for 2 overcards

If rags are spread out like 2 5 9- bet. If rags are consecutive like 567- check. If your opponents are aggressive- check. If they are passive- bet. If your table image sucks- check, if good- bet.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-13-2006, 09:25 AM
Hellmouth Hellmouth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: In the fade
Posts: 1,314
Default Q

[ QUOTE ]
If rags are spread out like 2 5 9- bet. If rags are consecutive like 567- check. If your opponents are aggressive- check. If they are passive- bet. If your table image sucks- check, if good- bet.

[/ QUOTE ]

I would say also factor into the equation how good your overs are. AK for example is unlikely to be dominated and make the best hand if you spike one of them. QT is a lot more likely to be dominated and you are more likely to lose to a hand that dominates you (eg AQ).

Also consider the odds. At the nanolimit tables you are a lot more likely to be getting correct odds if the table is passive and no one will raise behind you.

Assume for a moment that the board is not connected and not two or three flushed. You have pretty good over cards (mabe KQ or KJ). You have 6 outs. I would discount them to 4. (discount to 3 or 2 if the board is really coordinated or 2 suited). You claim that there are usually ~6 people in on the flop. That is 6 bets in on th flop. Effectively 3 half those people will call the flop. And usually anyone that calls the flop will be on average for 3 more small bets to the river. So the pot will be ~9sb by the turn and 19sb by the river (including now your flop bet but not the turn bet).

So 19sb is your implied odds. Four outs give you (46/4)-1 odds or 10.5:1. (You should memorize this one, you will use it a lot) Therefore you easily have the odds to call one flop bet. Right now you do not have enough in there to call a turn bet since 2sb will be necessary and 19/2 is only 9.5 not 10.5. However if you get another caller in there (four instead of three) you can bet/call again. this will become a mistake if the turn is raised.

If you get a lot of people ducking out on the flop (like 6 callers pf but pots are usually heads up after the flop) then check/fold line is better if you don't have a good enough table image to get everyone to fold to your flop bet.

This is quite a lot of information. I am pretty sure it is all correct. However if anyone sees a flaw let me know.

I think in the nano's you are less likely to be dominated by a great hand so maybe you can adjust the out count upward to 5 on a nonscary board. I am not sure. That would easily give you odds to call the flop and possibly the turn.

Greg
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-13-2006, 09:38 AM
Absolution Absolution is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,016
Default Re: Q

You have 3 outs in every case. You don't make money in the nanos by raising A high on the flop into multiple opponents. You could try for a free card, but your draw isn't strong and you aren't going to get it every time so that's not a big issue either. Most of the time I just check it through if in position or call out of position if I have odds to draw to 3 outs on the turn.

Don't get attached to it. You raise your good ace preflop because of your equity, but now that you missed the flop it's just another weak draw. At this level you have gained so little fold equity with your preflop raise that you shouldn't feel like you have to make a continuation bet. If there were less opponents, an aggressive table, back door draws, etc... the story changes.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-13-2006, 12:01 PM
MightySantos MightySantos is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 10
Default Re: Q

Your avatar is fantastic... but makes reading the forum at work difficult [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-13-2006, 01:13 PM
bozlax bozlax is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wookie is right
Posts: 8,848
Default Re: Q

[ QUOTE ]
Your avatar is fantastic... but makes reading the forum at work difficult [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

*sob* His avatar is gone.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-13-2006, 01:15 PM
MrWookie MrWookie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Treating my drinking problem
Posts: 17,411
Default Re: Q

Sorry guys. I hadn't spotted it earlier, but 2+2 forbids nipples in avatars.

Edit: Female nipples. Male nipples are allowed, I guess. If photos of your own nipples replace photos of your own footwear, though, I think I may have to find a new forum to mod.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.