#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Thursday: A&M at Miami
I will be on the over closer to game time.
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Thursday: A&M at Miami
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Looking into ML as well, anyone have an idea when Bodog will post a ML? [/ QUOTE ] game starts at 7:45pm EST? probably around 7:30 [/ QUOTE ] im sorry for the hijack but seriously this is a major gripe I have, WTF BODOG, I know they have spies on here, are you really that scarred of giving up your rape-equity to us when you already have so much from f'ed lines to begin with WTF datamines discriminate against the black QBs |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Thursday: A&M at Miami
Sorry -2
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Thursday: A&M at Miami
Not betting this one on the spread
My preseason index has it Miami -1.5 My index based on the combined ratings at Massey compare has it A&M +4...(combined ratings based on 20 some odd published computer indexes) My index based on the 'experts' I trust most (CFN #1-#119 poll) has it A&M -0.5. As pointed out, A&M might be inflated due to an easier schedule. Also, Thursday night prime home teams have shown a larger than expected home field advantage over the past 4 to 5 years. SO, My indexes show no edge. I see nothing between the two teams to suggest bucking that. However, I do see a play on the over A&M/Miami Fl o45 bet 1.05u to win 1u Thursday nights have shown fireworks. I love A&M's ability to score on Miami. I overrated Marshall's offense early, so was extra impressed by the Miami D. I was wrong. OK, A&M doesn't have the balance of Oklahoma, but they do provide a very dynamic offense that is tough to stop. If Miami stacks the line, A&M does provide enough passing. Plus, a stacked line is less effective stopping a spread-option rushing attack that gets defenders in space than a traditional rushing attack. On the other side of the ball, The Aggies have struggled on D and the Hurricanes have struggled on O. A&M is giving up 383 ypg (slightly inflated due to a multi-OT game) v pretty weak competition. Montana St...LOL. Fresno St is done from what it was. UL-Monroe has shown they can rush (s Car and A&M), but that is still kind of shady. Miami's QB situation appears to be clear. Hopefully, it will be enough. My model predicts 48 points in this one. I see no reason to override it. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Thursday: A&M at Miami
WOW. I never would have thought this many people would have gone with my boys on this game.
The main reason that I believe that UM has a decent chance to cover in this game is the fact that Texas A&M's defense has been shown to have some holes in it against poor teams. They gave up over 400 yards against Montana State in their opener, and had to go into a couple OTs to beat Fresno State @ home. With that said Kyle Wright will have to learn how to step up in the pocket, take a hit, and complete some passes, as I believe A&M will load the box to play against our only offensive strengths in James and Cooper (avg 172yrds/gm against Marshall, OU, and FIU--only 54 yards combined against OU!) Another fact/opinion (no stats)that gives the edge to A&M is the fact that the have a very mobile QB in McGee. If anyone has followed Miami in the past couple years, they know that most of the O's that gave us a lot of trouble used their QB to scramble at least twice a scoring drive..besides OU, they did anything they wanted to against us on offense. Anyway, enough rambling, I'm not a handicapper..just couldnt stop typing. (PS I did put a small bet on the Canes, but only as a fan--I believe A&M has enough firepower to cover at the Orange Bowl) GO CANES |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Thursday: A&M at Miami
You don't factor in the weather at all in this game myturn for the total?
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Thursday: A&M at Miami
[ QUOTE ]
You don't factor in the weather at all in this game myturn for the total? [/ QUOTE ] This is one of the more misused factors by the public. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Thursday: A&M at Miami
[ QUOTE ]
I will be on the over closer to game time. [/ QUOTE ] Do you expect to be able to get better than 45? |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Thursday: A&M at Miami
[ QUOTE ]
Also, Thursday night prime home teams have shown a larger than expected home field advantage over the past 4 to 5 years. [/ QUOTE ] This was the tipping point for me. It's been that way this season, even with Maryland who I thought played pretty well even in their loss. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Thursday: A&M at Miami
[ QUOTE ]
Not betting this one on the spread My preseason index has it Miami -1.5 My index based on the combined ratings at <a href="massy ratings compare" target="_blank">Massey</a> compare has it A&M +4...(combined ratings based on 20 some odd published computer indexes) My index based on the 'experts' I trust most (CFN #1-#119 poll) has it A&M -0.5. As pointed out, A&M might be inflated due to an easier schedule. Also, Thursday night prime home teams have shown a larger than expected home field advantage over the past 4 to 5 years. SO, My indexes show no edge. I see nothing between the two teams to suggest bucking that. However, I do see a play on the over A&M/Miami Fl o45 bet 1.05u to win 1u Thursday nights have shown fireworks. I love A&M's ability to score on Miami. I overrated Marshall's offense early, so was extra impressed by the Miami D. I was wrong. OK, A&M doesn't have the balance of Oklahoma, but they do provide a very dynamic offense that is tough to stop. If Miami stacks the line, A&M does provide enough passing. Plus, a stacked line is less effective stopping a spread-option rushing attack that gets defenders in space than a traditional rushing attack. On the other side of the ball, The Aggies have struggled on D and the Hurricanes have struggled on O. A&M is giving up 383 ypg (slightly inflated due to a multi-OT game) v pretty weak competition. Montana St...LOL. Fresno St is done from what it was. UL-Monroe has shown they can rush (s Car and A&M), but that is still kind of shady. Miami's QB situation appears to be clear. Hopefully, it will be enough. My model predicts 48 points in this one. I see no reason to override it. [/ QUOTE ] Hopefully weather will be horrible, keeping it under :-) |
|
|