Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > News, Views, and Gossip
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 09-25-2007, 08:00 AM
Kilay Kilay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Holland anyone ??
Posts: 277
Default Re: 25-50 6 max deep stacks on Stars

Don't play that high (yet) but I sure like what Daniel is doing for Pokerstars and it's players since obviously both parties get benefits from it

Keep up the good work [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-25-2007, 08:15 AM
clintbygget clintbygget is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: SWEDEN
Posts: 23
Default Re: 25-50 6 max deep stacks on Stars

-NLT cashgames with ante.
-New game: Badougi.
-Higher stakes for 5 card draw.
-HORSE Tournaments with added 5 card draw and 2-7 lowball. That would be so cool!
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-25-2007, 08:16 AM
luckyjimm luckyjimm is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: blogging
Posts: 6,106
Default Re: 25-50 6 max deep stacks on Stars

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Could you ask them to implement a "super-user" mode, and make it available to 2+2ers?
It is important that PokerStars keeps up with other sites in this regard, e.g. Absolute.

[/ QUOTE ]

Stop dude.

[/ QUOTE ]


Too soon?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 09-25-2007, 08:18 AM
johnnyrocket johnnyrocket is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: 8 tabling and raising all donk bets
Posts: 3,679
Default Re: 25-50 6 max deep stacks on Stars

very nice work mr negreanu
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 09-25-2007, 08:32 AM
1p0kerboy 1p0kerboy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: 492k
Posts: 6,026
Default Re: 25-50 6 max deep stacks on Stars

DN-

A post like this is certainly not spam.

Something that almost all of us would like to see is a solution to the short-stackers that are ruining the games. As you know, there is a flurry of players buying in for 20bb and playing the short-stack strategy which takes advantage of the looser players, who aren't necessarily playing bad because normally they have potentially big implied odds (against the non short-stackers). This causes the games to tighten up, which isn't really good for anybody, including the site.

At the same time, I don't think anybody wants to discourage players who are taking a shot at a higher limit.

I think an adequate solution is either a 30-40bb minimum buy-in across the board OR increase the amount of time that a player must sit-out without returning to the table with the amount that he left with (ratholing).
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 09-25-2007, 08:42 AM
VPIP100 VPIP100 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 1,636
Default Re: 25-50 6 max deep stacks on Stars

Ante NLHE games would put stars clearly at top. (for every level, LDO)
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 09-25-2007, 09:18 AM
Carolina Pirate Carolina Pirate is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 242
Default Re: 25-50 6 max deep stacks on Stars

Higher PL & NL stakes for Triple Draw
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 09-25-2007, 09:19 AM
1p0kerboy 1p0kerboy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: 492k
Posts: 6,026
Default Re: 25-50 6 max deep stacks on Stars

Case in point.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 09-25-2007, 09:37 AM
_And1_ _And1_ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lalaland
Posts: 777
Default Re: 25-50 6 max deep stacks on Stars

-Mixed PLO/PLHE games
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 09-25-2007, 09:44 AM
RoundTower RoundTower is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: pushing YOU off the second nuts
Posts: 4,035
Default Re: 25-50 6 max deep stacks on Stars

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I think it would be great if they had lower limit HU tables.

Preferably .02/.05 or .05/.10

I know .25/.50 is considered lower limits, but it would really be great to get heads up experience without having to play $50 buyins every time.



[/ QUOTE ]

You realise you would go broke because of the rake right?

[/ QUOTE ]
in that case, why don't Stars have them already?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.