#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: From today\'s Wall Street Journal
The good news Jack - your reposts are a riot. The bad news - these people vote. I'll be in LV Mom's Day Weekend - hangin' in the MGM.
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: From today\'s Wall Street Journal
[ QUOTE ]
Obviously it is skill or no one could make a living off of it, they and everyone else would be breakeven (ignoring rake). [/ QUOTE ] Just because the average is breakeven doesn't mean most people (or even ANYONE) will be breakeven. If you held a winner-take-all tournament where everyone had 0 EV, the winner would be the lucky pro for the day. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: From today\'s Wall Street Journal
The legal ramifications of the skill v. luck debate is interesting.
In Canada and Ireland (and probably other places I don't know of) there is no tax on poker income because it is lumped with games of chance for taxation purposes. In the U.S., it was a big fight to get it treated as a game of skill so there would be less tax on poker income. Kinda funny. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: From today\'s Wall Street Journal
I agree. Us stewpid peepole could reed it and still no get it.
|
|
|