**Official uNL Stats thread** - Page 39

toddxlogan · #**381** 10-08-2007, 11:36 PM

[ QUOTE ]
I'd raise first in in the SB more, but everything else seems okay. Maybe try to stab at smaller pots that looks like no one else wants to take.

[/ QUOTE ]

1) Reasonable raise first in number from SB?

2) Why, does my w$/wsf look a little low?

Thanks!

Todd

thac · #**382** 10-09-2007, 01:24 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'd raise first in in the SB more, but everything else seems okay. Maybe try to stab at smaller pots that looks like no one else wants to take.

[/ QUOTE ]

1) Reasonable raise first in number from SB?

2) Why, does my w$/wsf look a little low?

Thanks!

Todd

[/ QUOTE ]

1 - like 10, bb is gonna fold a lot of the time, i promise
2 - yeah, like 40-42 is a bit better, it means you're amping up the aggression (not always best, but good to prepare for higher levels)

toddxlogan · #**383** 10-09-2007, 08:27 AM

Thac-

Thanks. Your thoughts are much appreciated, and I'm gonna see what I can do about making those changes.

Anyone else have anything they see?

Todd

yegon · #**384** 10-11-2007, 05:16 AM

I was checking my data in PT when I came across this problem in heads-up pots and also in multiway

[ QUOTE ]

go to “Filters…” and under “Pre-flop Raise” select “No Raise.” This will show you how you’ve done when you didn’t raise preflop, but the hand was heads-up on the flop (this includes pure limping and when someone ELSE raised preflop, but not when you were the preflop raiser). Is this number positive? If not, it could be an indicator that you have trouble when you are not the aggressor preflop, especially without padding in the pot.

[/ QUOTE ]

This number is negative in my db. I really do not see how this could get positive as most of these hands are free play out of the BB or completing from the SB. My stats for play out of the blinds seem to be ok. I am just not sure how am I supposed to get enough profits from the few pots where I do not raise preflop to cover the blind losses.

What should I try to look at in my db to find out why this is negative? What can be done about it?

Sniiii · #**385** 10-15-2007, 02:45 PM

How do I find a graph on how much I've earned on a relative number of hands? I'd like to post it together with my stats, if possible

PJo336 · #**386** 10-15-2007, 02:55 PM

not sure if this link still works, 2nd program down on the list "poker grapher" works with PT

http://overcards.com/dl.php

swearengen13 · #**387** 10-18-2007, 12:16 PM

Full ring, i want to win way more, any advice?

Spurious · #**388** 10-18-2007, 12:21 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Full ring, i want to win way more, any advice?

[/ QUOTE ]

stop folding all the time
raise more and i think this belongs in the FR anyways

hoyasaxa · #**389** 10-23-2007, 02:27 AM

I have stats finally! small sample size but im too busto to afford pt. all comments appreciated

kroeliewoelie · #**390** 10-23-2007, 05:14 AM

hoyasaxa, try to get your VPIP closer to your PFR. 21/12 is fishy and a bit scared. I'd suggest that you play a little less hands and raise more hands you play. Something like 18/16.

You are quite aggressive on the flop and particularly the turn, compared to river and preflop, but I don't know if that's due to a small sample (I think it takes a while for these numbers to converge. Don't know how long a while is.)