Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-19-2007, 06:26 PM
l0gician l0gician is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 136
Default Re: 44 BvB

I dunno the flop and after I felt I was betting for value. Oink I see a c/r on the flop as leagues ahead of my donk bet too. Maybe I am too scared of losing a big pot and would have folded the donk bet to a raise. If I c/r and he capped again then I'm not sure what to do. I do realize this hand was played like an expert donk, but maybe it will give him something to think about next bvb.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-19-2007, 06:28 PM
Oink Oink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SLAAAYYYERRRR ! ! ! !
Posts: 4,226
Default Re: 44 BvB

I dont think c/r is better than donking here.

You do realize that you can c/c as well, right?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-19-2007, 06:52 PM
kross kross is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 715
Default Re: 44 BvB

[ QUOTE ]
You do realize that you can c/c as well, right?

[/ QUOTE ]

Wait, what? You can do that?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-19-2007, 06:58 PM
l0gician l0gician is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 136
Default Re: 44 BvB

Why c/c if you think you are best?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-19-2007, 07:01 PM
Oink Oink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SLAAAYYYERRRR ! ! ! !
Posts: 4,226
Default Re: 44 BvB

[ QUOTE ]
Why c/c if you think you are best?

[/ QUOTE ]

Because villain is betting his entire range and raising his better hands.

So when you bet you get 2 bets in when behind and 1 bet in when ahead.

When you c/c you get 1 bet in regardless.


The post you just made is a good example of the wrong way of thinking about poker.

I suggest you pick up some basic poker theory books. Like Theory of Poker.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-19-2007, 07:06 PM
l0gician l0gician is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 136
Default Re: 44 BvB

getting $ in when you are better is not good theory?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-19-2007, 07:09 PM
l0gician l0gician is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 136
Default Re: 44 BvB

If I fold to the raise I lose 2, if I c/c and lose I lose 3? I'm playing 6 tables and trying to write here, probably a retarded idea.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-19-2007, 07:28 PM
Oink Oink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SLAAAYYYERRRR ! ! ! !
Posts: 4,226
Default Re: 44 BvB

[ QUOTE ]
getting $ in when you are better is not good theory?

[/ QUOTE ]

I see you are into math so lets do this example

You are on the river

You know your opponenet can have 3 hands. 1, 2 and 3. The 3 hands are equally likely

You beat hands 1 and 2 and loose to hand 3

The pot is 0 bets.

If you bet he will raise hands 2 and 3. Since you will get 3:1 on your call you have to b/c. He will fold hand 1

If you check he will bet all 3 hands.

EV of c/c = 1/3 + 1/3 - 1/3 = 1/3
EV of b/c = 2/3 - 2/3 = 0


So no, "getting $ in when you are better" is not a good theory. You have to consider what he does with the various hands in his range.


Getting back to your hand. Since he will bet his entire range betting does you no good.

When he raises you will either put in 1 more bet as a dog or you will fold your hand in a big pot at a point where it still might be good.

Your line of complete/raise/call PF and then donk/fold flop is God awful against this kind of player and against 90% of all online players when you consider it is a BvB spot.

You are thinking about LHE and prolly poker the wrong way.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-19-2007, 08:05 PM
l0gician l0gician is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 136
Default Re: 44 BvB

Probably am thinking about it wrong because I can't stand c/c'ing. I already know the hand was played like a tard. I also am 99% sure he isn't folding ever no matter what comes down.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-19-2007, 09:20 PM
rzk rzk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 647
Default Re: 44 BvB

roughly speaking, if you will call his raise (or if you have a somewhat close fold) and if he always bets if you check and never folds a worse hand if you bet, you need to be about 2/3 favorite to choose betting over checking. so no, it's not enough to be a favorite.

also, if he folds some worse hands to your bet, you need to be an even bigger favorite.

you are never this much of a favorite with your 44. you also cannot comfortably fold if he raises.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.