Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-13-2007, 07:25 PM
stokken stokken is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 587
Default UGH! YA! but NO! reverse implied odds

Full Tilt Hold'em (6 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver)

Preflop: Hero is Button with 9, Q.
UTG calls, 1 fold</font>, CO calls, Hero calls, SB completes, BB checks.

Flop: (5 SB) 8, J, T (5 players)</font>
SB checks, BB bets</font>, UTG raises</font>, CO folds, Hero 3-bets</font>, SB folds, BB calls, UTG calls. With a made hand there is no other option right, noone is folding here with a strong draw. The action ahead is favourable to me? charging the most.

Turn: (7 BB)J, speedmuck if heat right?

Stokken
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-13-2007, 09:41 PM
aceskay aceskay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 409
Default Re: UGH! YA! but NO! reverse implied odds

what kind of player is BB, what about UTG?

i would only fold if it goes BB bet, UTG raise in front of you on the turn.

Both BB and UTG could have lots of hands you still beat, like pair + draw, trips + draw, worse straight + draw.

If it goes BB bets, UTG calls, I probably raise and then fold to a 3-bet.

Just my .02, definitely an intersting hand though.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-13-2007, 11:58 PM
NinaWilliams NinaWilliams is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Broken-hearted, Battle-scarred
Posts: 2,008
Default Re: UGH! YA! but NO! reverse implied odds

I think the flop play is fine. Not many cards hurt you, and if you wait to raise the turn, getting 3 bet sucks. As played, Id bet and call down a raise. Also, consider raising preflop.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-14-2007, 07:38 AM
Gurravasa Gurravasa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: what used to Denmark before we beat them
Posts: 1,307
Default Re: UGH! YA! but NO! reverse implied odds

I would raise pf and outplay limpers postflop IP.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-14-2007, 07:41 AM
Wolfram Wolfram is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Reykjavik
Posts: 3,306
Default Re: UGH! YA! but NO! reverse implied odds

[ QUOTE ]
J, speedmuck if heat right?

[/ QUOTE ]
Why would you fold the nuts? If it goes bet, raise to you I'd just call down, if you get c/r, call down, if it goes bet, raise, you call, 3-bet, cap, then curse and call and try to see a showdown on a safe river for the least amount of bets.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-14-2007, 08:43 AM
Fluffy_Shark Fluffy_Shark is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 56
Default Re: UGH! YA! but NO! reverse implied odds

wait. you suggest to see a showdown with a straight on a 3way capped turn on a paired board with flush possibility? no way. when the turn is capped you're toast. do you think they both have AJ?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-14-2007, 08:52 AM
Wolfram Wolfram is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Reykjavik
Posts: 3,306
Default Re: UGH! YA! but NO! reverse implied odds

I can't see the suits in the OP. Is there 3 to a flush on the board?

If so, then I'd probably have to fold to a turn cap. But I'm still not folding if it's 2 bets to me.

And the way the games are today, they really don't need AJ on the turn to go overboard with raising. They could both have any Jx or one has Jx and the other has some sort of combodraw that he wants to gambool with, or 79 that he thinks is the nuts.

Sure, we're beat some % of the time, but I still think calling down a turn raise is probably +EV.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-14-2007, 08:57 AM
Fluffy_Shark Fluffy_Shark is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 56
Default Re: UGH! YA! but NO! reverse implied odds

yeah, the flop is all spades. folding for 2 is close I guess and calling down seems ok as the flop wasnt capped.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-14-2007, 09:04 AM
Wolfram Wolfram is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Reykjavik
Posts: 3,306
Default Re: UGH! YA! but NO! reverse implied odds

Since the flop is all spades I would discount flopped sets some (they probably cap the flop while their equity is good).

But I guess then we need to worry about a slowplayed flush.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.