San Francisco goes after trans fats too

[PLOlover]

[ QUOTE ]
Is it my obligation to you to contribute to the demand for the types of foods that you want available?

[/ QUOTE ]

despite your rhetoric, there's no demand for trans fats. no consumer demand.

there is some consumer demand for fluoride in the water at least, from people who misunderstand the issue or who have been propagandized.

but people eat trans fats totally out of ignorance. with the exceptikon of the jews and butter/meat, which btw is totally false look it up abraham ate them all at the same time. which even if true btw doesn't mean u eat p;osion instead.

[ALawPoker]

You can keep repeating yourself about your not accepting that TF has any real "benefit" all you'd like (it was bizarre the first time as well as the tenth time). But your aversion to actually answering my specific questions is telling. You backed yourself into a wall with that analogy and now you're avoiding my question (even after quoting it) and just repeating step 1.

I don't have much more to say (and apparently neither do you). Take care.

[PLOlover]

[ QUOTE ]
You can keep repeating yourself about your not accepting that TF has any real "benefit" all you'd like (it was bizarre the first time as well as the tenth time). But your aversion to actually answering my specific questions is telling. You backed yourself into a wall with that analogy and now you're avoiding my question (even after quoting it) and just repeating step 1.

I don't have much more to say (and apparently neither do you). Take care.

[/ QUOTE ]

[ALawPoker]

[ QUOTE ]
who won arg

[/ QUOTE ]

Lol. While this promises to be exciting, I'm not sure this exchange really qualifies as an "argument." You made a claim that you support state restriction of TF on the grounds that they have "no benefit" to consumers. I've merely questioned the merit of this claim and asked you to elaborate on some extensions of it (which you still haven't done).

So I don't see what I was really "arguing" per se, since I claimed no position, other than not accepting your premise at face value. I guess that counts as an argument. But this poll should be exciting regardless. It's currently 1-1. I wonder whose votes those could possibly be. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]