#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Im so boring. Prs to be line check? NL100
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] As a general rule, in raised pots I would check a straight and FD flop behind because I think that stacking off there is relatively unprofitable given that the type of hand that villain will stack off with is either ahead or has excellent equity. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah don't do this either. bet-bet-bet [/ QUOTE ] Ok, so your line in a situation where you raise pre with AA, villain flats IP, flop 987 two tone, you lead and he raises? Flat call or b3b? |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Im so boring. Prs to be line check? NL100
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] As a general rule, in raised pots I would check a straight and FD flop behind because I think that stacking off there is relatively unprofitable given that the type of hand that villain will stack off with is either ahead or has excellent equity. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah don't do this either. bet-bet-bet [/ QUOTE ] Ok, so your line in a situation where you raise pre with AA, villain flats IP, flop 987 two tone, you lead and he raises? Flat call or b3b? [/ QUOTE ] This is a fold, there is a world of diff between 987 and 954 though. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Im so boring. Prs to be line check? NL100
With 100BB it's not terrible to slowplay a bit on the flop vs. a guy who's passive (if he's aggro bet so he can bluff you). Stacks like this though I almost never slowplay. Turn is standard imo, river I'd prefer like a raise to 65 or something dumb/fold to rr.
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Im so boring. Prs to be line check? NL100
I bet flop
Raise turn as played river shove seems cool |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Im so boring. Prs to be line check? NL100
In the end he had KQss so I was getting stacked pretty much whatever happened, but this thread has taught me a lot so ty all for responses [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Im so boring. Prs to be line check? NL100
[ QUOTE ]
I dont bet the flop because I dont want to bet/fold, and I think that very few hands of his just call on this board. I dont want to stack off on the flop because IMO the range of hands which I am ahead of there (which will call 100bb) is thin (basically only overpairs) and everything else either has pretty decent equity or just folds. I guess the same goes on the turn, but then that makes my river shove really bad =( On the river, his line fits a hand like KQ/AK with one spade so well that I figure I can shove for value. Yes? No? [/ QUOTE ] Ur flop logic is poor, there r a lot of overpairs in villains range that will shove and u have very good equity against flush draws. Ur river shove is marginal IMO, CO sometimes plays a scared set this way and I dont think kq or sometimes ak pay off that river too often. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Im so boring. Prs to be line check? NL100
[ QUOTE ]
I dont bet the flop because I dont want to bet/fold, and I think that very few hands of his just call on this board. I dont want to stack off on the flop because IMO the range of hands which I am ahead of there (which will call 100bb) is thin (basically only overpairs) and everything else either has pretty decent equity or just folds. I guess the same goes on the turn, but then that makes my river shove really bad =( On the river, his line fits a hand like KQ/AK with one spade so well that I figure I can shove for value. Yes? No? [/ QUOTE ] :ukes a little:: you are very much ahead of the range you described |
|
|