Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Beginners Questions
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-06-2007, 07:42 PM
Mr. Ratface Mr. Ratface is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Concordia University
Posts: 220
Default Pokertracker question

When I first got pokertracker I was in a period where I was learning limit and therefore playing limit. I got accustomed to the BB/100 thing and to my understanding 3bb/100 is good for limit. However, I am finally tracking my no limit stats since I am playing it again and I am not sure what to look for.
Is it measured in terms of BB/100 or is there some other sort of measurement?
What is a good winrate to look for in nl?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-06-2007, 08:25 PM
Quicksilvre Quicksilvre is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Clinging to the binomial theorem like a drunk to a lamppost
Posts: 3,482
Default Re: Pokertracker question

As-is, Poker Tracker measures no limit winnings in PTBB/100 (Poker Tracker Big Bets/100), which is the number of big blinds won per 100 hands divided by two. Most players prefer to set Poker Tracker to regular BB/100, i.e. big blinds per 100 hands. (To do that, go to the Ring Games Stats page, click the "Preferences" tab, and find the check box marked "Treat 'BB' for NL/PL as Big Blind Amt."

As always, anything above zero is good. Getting 10 big blinds/100 is doing great, and probably not sustainable above the micro limits. Someone who plays NL more than I do can be more specific about reasonable win rates.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-06-2007, 08:33 PM
hihimichelle hihimichelle is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 17
Default Re: Pokertracker question

Yeah BB/100 at micro limits around 10 is a good number. I saw some guy with bb/100 of 22.03 on here at micro and he was asking for some advice. Well, to that get bb/100 i wouldn't say he needs much. I had a BB/100 of 14 and then in the last 1k of hands, i'm down at 9.80. Not much you can do.. when u lose with rockets twice, KK, nuts flush [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] I'm not a great player mine. A player with good reads, flop play would probably get around 15-20 bb/100 at low stakes. Just playing TTA is good enough for around 10 i'd say. Just playing ABC poker.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-06-2007, 09:30 PM
Mr. Ratface Mr. Ratface is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Concordia University
Posts: 220
Default Re: Pokertracker question

[ QUOTE ]
As-is, Poker Tracker measures no limit winnings in PTBB/100 (Poker Tracker Big Bets/100), which is the number of big blinds won per 100 hands divided by two. Most players prefer to set Poker Tracker to regular BB/100, i.e. big blinds per 100 hands. (To do that, go to the Ring Games Stats page, click the "Preferences" tab, and find the check box marked "Treat 'BB' for NL/PL as Big Blind Amt."

As always, anything above zero is good. Getting 10 big blinds/100 is doing great, and probably not sustainable above the micro limits. Someone who plays NL more than I do can be more specific about reasonable win rates.

[/ QUOTE ]


Thank you, that is very helpful. So basically if I have it set as BB/100 hands than anything over 10 is good for the micros.
Wouldnt my ptbb/100 just be half of my bb/100? Which also means anything over 5 is good for ptbb/100 or am I wrong in last point?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-06-2007, 09:35 PM
hockeyav hockeyav is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 113
Default Re: Pokertracker question

Yes, 5 PTBB/100 = 10 BB/100
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.