|
|
#121
02-27-2006, 08:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100/200 on stars
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] togni - sorry to hear it's not going well and I hate to kinda call you out here on a public stage and mb I should pm you...but you did post this here...and while I agree with you about stars, I always swore it was rigged too (and I'm only kinda kidding, I swear stupider crap happened on there than any other site and I'm a big lifetime loser on there as well. Probably nothing but anytime you have a hint of doubt like that and esp when other top players who don't believe in rigged sites feel the same way about ps...it really makes for a bad situation and I just don't play on there anymore. [/ QUOTE ] BK, how serious are you about this? I was talking to a universally recognized excellent player this summer and he told me that he ran horrendous at that game. [/ QUOTE ] im a lifetime loser on stars. other regular posters are as well. the successful high limit players i know just dont play there. Barron [/ QUOTE ] Who is winning there? [/ QUOTE ] apparently it is MATTSUSPECT who is working with LEE JONES and taking everyones' money over at pokerstars [/ QUOTE ] Obviously its SpicyF who is winning at stars, who else?! 
|
|
#123
02-27-2006, 10:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100/200 on stars
[ QUOTE ]
tongni we love you!!!! you are better than all of us at poker but you have lost more than all of us [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Uhmm, I'm sure I blew through more than 200K worth of depostit bonuses. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
|
|
#124
02-27-2006, 11:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100/200 on stars
[quote
[/ QUOTE ] apparently it is MATTSUSPECT who is working with LEE JONES and taking everyones' money over at pokerstars [/ QUOTE ] The secret is out, Lee protects me as well by not contacting me so I can never get 100/200 access.
|
|
#125
02-27-2006, 12:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100/200 on stars
This thread is just one big ego-circle-jerk-disguised-as-conspiracy-theory for all the high-limit players who ran badly/lost at Stars.
For those who actually think Stars is rigged and you play at high-stakes...that's adorable.
|
|
#127
02-27-2006, 12:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100/200 on stars
[ QUOTE ]
This thread is just one big ego-circle-jerk-disguised-as-conspiracy-theory for all the high-limit players who ran badly/lost at Stars. For those who actually think Stars is rigged and you play at high-stakes...that's adorable. [/ QUOTE ] Rigged isn't the concern. But when BK, Barron, Paluka, XXX, XXX and say they've gotten crushed at Stars something might be amiss.
|
|
#130
02-27-2006, 12:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100/200 on stars
Small edge (if any)+ HU/2-3 players-->massive going broke-backing swings.
If we can see 600BB swings at 10/20 six-max from world-class players over 60k hands, why is everyone so surprised when 2+2s finest get crushed over small samples when their edge is smaller and they are playing a higher variance game? Maybe...just maybe...the edge of twoplustwo's finest at these games is smaller than they are willing to admit? Nevermind, that is ridiculous. PS is rigged.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
