#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ROI - What is a good target for small live SNG\'s?
ill talk to micro, he forgot to nap today.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ROI - What is a good target for small live SNG\'s?
No lock yet? wow
And 400% is not at all sustainable. I play SNGs in a very very VERY soft home game and I'm hovering around 90%-100% over 150 games. Unless your playing against the mental handicap I don't think over 150% is sustainable. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ROI - What is a good target for small live SNG\'s?
[ QUOTE ]
No lock yet? wow And 400% is not at all sustainable. I play SNGs in a very very VERY soft home game and I'm hovering around 90%-100% over 150 games. Unless your playing against the mental handicap I don't think over 150% is sustainable. [/ QUOTE ] You're probably just getting unlucky. I understand you lose a lot of 70/30s. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ROI - What is a good target for small live SNG\'s?
You are saying LIVE SNGs are 5 times easier then online?
So basically it is 60% flops? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ROI - What is a good target for small live SNG\'s?
400-500% would make SNG's VASTLY more profitable than LLHE. Yet, most SNG's charge a higher percentage in fees than the standard rake in either LLHE or 1/2 NL. At the 30-50% ROI range, the profits look closer to comparable, which makes a lot more sense.
I am just keeping a basic spreadsheet of all my live play to make sure that I am honest with myself and hopefully can demonstrate long term improvement in any part of poker I choose to pursue. I believe that winners keep score and that golf courses have a par that you play against. In LLHE "par" is 1 BB/hr. That measure doesn't work in SNG's. What's "par" here? It looks like ROI of 130%+ or so. And yes, I know that is only meaningful after a sufficient # of rounds. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ROI - What is a good target for small live SNG\'s?
[ QUOTE ]
POS live SnGs [/ QUOTE ] eurythmech - you obviously have me mistaken for someone who cares what you think or say. Don't waste your precious time on me by responding to any of my posts, OK? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ROI - What is a good target for small live SNG\'s?
I heard bigjoe was crushing $40,000 9 man's for 1000% so it's definately sustainable moran's.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ROI - What is a good target for small live SNG\'s?
Ok, sorry. I was just kidding. 30% is probably about right, maybe even a little less because the rake usually sucks live.
Except the question still is silly since you can't target an ROI and you'll never ever know what your ROI is. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ROI - What is a good target for small live SNG\'s?
Your ROI is easy to know - (all$out/all$in)-1. Just keep track. Right now my math is 646/440 for an ROI of 56%.
I'll admit it is not "statistically significant" but it remains a usable measure of performance. Even if you've played golf only once, your score against par means something. If it's so "silly" can you suggest a better measure of performance that captures: 1) all income and expenses, 2) includes information about profit or loss, and 3) allows for comparisons between players and "courses" if the players keep score honestly? |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ROI - What is a good target for small live SNG\'s?
He saying that your 56% ROI as calculated would have a very small confidence level Like your ROI may be 56% +/- 60%. Therefore, regardless of what you calculate it really isn't a measure of how you are doing in the game until you have played thousands.
|
|
|