25k at the 60s in 1 month challenge (Oct props)

[spacegravy]

[ QUOTE ]
FWIW don't reshove me (again) at 50/100 (we both have 1500ish) when i raise 3x UTG and you have 88, you're not ahead [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img].

Good luck.

[/ QUOTE ]

HH?

[TimWakefield]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
FWIW don't reshove me (again) at 50/100 (we both have 1500ish) when i raise 3x UTG and you have 88, you're not ahead [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img].

Good luck.

[/ QUOTE ]

HH?

[/ QUOTE ]

Nah it would take me forever to find. I think it was approximately we both had 1300-1500 at 50/100, I'm utg or utg+1 and go 3x, you shovel 88 from MP and beat my 9s [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img].

Anyways I'll see ya on the tables after the Sox game.

[spacegravy]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
FWIW don't reshove me (again) at 50/100 (we both have 1500ish) when i raise 3x UTG and you have 88, you're not ahead [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img].

Good luck.

[/ QUOTE ]



HH?

[/ QUOTE ]

Nah it would take me forever to find. I think it was approximately we both had 1300-1500 at 50/100, I'm utg or utg+1 and go 3x, you shovel 88 from MP and beat my 9s [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img].

Anyways I'll see ya on the tables after the Sox game.

[/ QUOTE ]

I really would like to see the HH, i dont think ive ever done that before.

[suzzer99]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
FWIW don't reshove me (again) at 50/100 (we both have 1500ish) when i raise 3x UTG and you have 88, you're not ahead [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img].

Good luck.

[/ QUOTE ]

HH?

[/ QUOTE ]

Nah it would take me forever to find. I think it was approximately we both had 1300-1500 at 50/100, I'm utg or utg+1 and go 3x, you shovel 88 from MP and beat my 9s [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img].

Anyways I'll see ya on the tables after the Sox game.

[/ QUOTE ]

Someone should run this hand in SNGWiz. If you think gravy's range is TT+,AK - I think 99 is a fold even with dead money. Also why I like to either make it 250 or open-shove a hand like that UTG at that level.

Either of you just search your HHs for "Dealt to (me) [8c, 8" - you only have to search 4 times (one for each suit on the first 8 or 9). Tim what time was it roughly?

[mjnumb23]

i remember watching this hand. the blinds were 75/150. tim raised to 450, gravy shoved, and another guy with approx. equal stack got all in too. gravy had 8's, tim had 9's, other guy had 10's. gravy made a straight.

[spacegravy]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
FWIW don't reshove me (again) at 50/100 (we both have 1500ish) when i raise 3x UTG and you have 88, you're not ahead [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img].

Good luck.

[/ QUOTE ]

HH?

[/ QUOTE ]

Nah it would take me forever to find. I think it was approximately we both had 1300-1500 at 50/100, I'm utg or utg+1 and go 3x, you shovel 88 from MP and beat my 9s [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img].

Anyways I'll see ya on the tables after the Sox game.

[/ QUOTE ]

Someone should run this hand in SNGWiz. If you think gravy's range is TT+,AK - I think 99 is a fold even with dead money. Also why I like to either make it 250 or open-shove a hand like that UTG at that level.

Either of you just search your HHs for "Dealt to (me) [8c, 8" - you only have to search 4 times (one for each suit on the first 8 or 9). Tim what time was it roughly?

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed... but as mj just said i think he got the situation completely wrong.

[ronbo1964]

Does anyone have the number of games SpaceGravy started at on Sharkscope and what his profit was before he started ??? Those of us who don't subscribe could at least figure out where he is with this info LOL ... Thanks ...

[rakemeplz]

Not sure, his roi is roughly 4% I think thats where it was when he started.

[TimWakefield]

PokerStars Game #12732731397: Tournament #64616725, $55+$5 Hold'em No Limit - Level IV (50/100) - 2007/10/20 - 01:33:13 (ET)
Table '64616725 1' 9-max Seat #9 is the button
Seat 1: idm3mdi (1415 in chips)
Seat 3: scorpian5000 (1425 in chips) is sitting out
Seat 4: Vinytuc (1840 in chips)
Seat 5: 69HAMMSTER69 (3345 in chips)
Seat 6: Romes23 (965 in chips)
Seat 7: TimWakefield (1395 in chips)
Seat 8: sauvaojf (1570 in chips)
Seat 9: spacegravy (1545 in chips)
idm3mdi: posts small blind 50
scorpian5000: posts big blind 100
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to TimWakefield [9s 9h]
Vinytuc: folds
69HAMMSTER69: folds
Romes23: folds
TimWakefield: raises 200 to 300
sauvaojf: folds
spacegravy: raises 1245 to 1545 and is all-in
idm3mdi: folds
scorpian5000: folds
TimWakefield: calls 1095 and is all-in
*** FLOP *** [4h 4s 6c]
*** TURN *** [4h 4s 6c] [7c]
*** RIVER *** [4h 4s 6c 7c] [8c]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
TimWakefield: shows [9s 9h] (two pair, Nines and Fours)
spacegravy: shows [8d 8s] (a full house, Eights full of Fours)
scorpian5000 has returned
spacegravy collected 2940 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 2940 | Rake 0
Board [4h 4s 6c 7c 8c]
Seat 1: idm3mdi (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 3: scorpian5000 (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 4: Vinytuc folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: 69HAMMSTER69 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: Romes23 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 7: TimWakefield showed [9s 9h] and lost with two pair, Nines and Fours
Seat 8: sauvaojf folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 9: spacegravy (button) showed [8d 8s] and won (2940) with a full house, Eights full of Fours







[ QUOTE ]
Someone should run this hand in SNGWiz. If you think gravy's range is TT+,AK - I think 99 is a fold even with dead money. Also why I like to either make it 250 or open-shove a hand like that UTG at that level.

Either of you just search your HHs for "Dealt to (me) [8c, 8" - you only have to search 4 times (one for each suit on the first 8 or 9). Tim what time was it roughly?

[/ QUOTE ]

Eh, Gravy's range isn't that tight. I think he's more likely TT+, AQ+, and maybe much wider (I haven't played with him much). I think it's a call with the dead money, and anyways sometimes he has 88 [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img].

[ QUOTE ]
but as mj just said i think he got the situation completely wrong.

[/ QUOTE ]

So I did clearly get the situation wrong - I wasn't UTG and I think it makes both of our plays more reasonable. I was certainly closer than mj though [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img].


Edit: Meh, disregard my comment about the call^^. If I had been UTG it does look like an obvious fold now that I think about it.

Also, are you only allowed to play single-table for your bet? The $60 45-man are very fishy, and while they do take longer to finish, if you can fit some in you might as well because they are +++++++EV.

[AMT]

the hand is fine if tim isnt a nit. and of course 45 man sngs are not included in this prop, thatd change the entire dynamic of the bet.