Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #181  
Old 11-28-2007, 07:49 PM
THAY3R THAY3R is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The Great White Hope
Posts: 9,755
Default Re: ***Official 2007-2008 MLB Offseason Thread***

Rwperu,

[ QUOTE ]
They now need Dukes to stay out of trouble, Baldelli to stay healthy, and Gomes to be good.

[/ QUOTE ]

Why are you saying this?

They need ONE of those THREE players to become a serviceable Right Fielder.
Reply With Quote
  #182  
Old 11-28-2007, 07:50 PM
rwperu34 rwperu34 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 1,955
Default Re: ***Official 2007-2008 MLB Offseason Thread***

[ QUOTE ]
I think I'm higher on Garza and lower on Young then you. Maybe I'm weighting their performance this past year a little too much or something... Young has a long way to go (both at the plate and in the field) before he is an average corner outfielder.

/edit and I don't get the whole "until Plouffe is ready" thing. His upside is basically Bartlett.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, you are higher on Garza and lower on Young. Put those guys on a range of outcomes, then what do you think? Young's ceiling is higher, because his ceiling is best RF in the game, and that's more valuable than the best SP in the game. Don't forget to factor in the 20% of the time Garza's career will be affected by a major injury, compared to the 5% for Delmon. You're looking at it as Garza is better now, and even that's arguable.

I don't want this to get into a debate over who's better now or even who has more future value, but when talking ceiling, I hope you can see why Plouffe's is much better than Bartlett.
Reply With Quote
  #183  
Old 11-28-2007, 07:55 PM
gehrig gehrig is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: CHICAGO
Posts: 3,950
Default Re: ***Official 2007-2008 MLB Offseason Thread***

[ QUOTE ]
You're looking at it as Garza is better now, and even that's arguable.

[/ QUOTE ]
man wtf

uzr has young at 15 runs below average in the field last year. VORP has young at 5 runs above replacement and 16 runs below average last year. young is seriously terrible. dude is not going to turn into miguel cabrera.
Reply With Quote
  #184  
Old 11-28-2007, 07:59 PM
rwperu34 rwperu34 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 1,955
Default Re: ***Official 2007-2008 MLB Offseason Thread***

[ QUOTE ]
young was really really bad last year. a lot of the shine is gone there. i know pecota doesn't think too much of him now. maybe he gets good by the time he's expensive just in time for the twins to trade him.

harris is bad enough defensively that he doesn't really have any value. bartlett is significantly better.

[/ QUOTE ]

What is this Young is really really bad talk? He was a little below average as a 21yo in the bigs. Not only can guys with tools like him take giant leaps forward, they are expected to. Even PECOTA projected a 28 point jump in OPS from age 21-22, which equates to 8 points in EQA. Obviously there is risk that he won't become a superstar, but the chances of him not being at least average over the next five years is on the low side. This is basically the Rays selling low on a five tool 22yo RF after one bad year.
Reply With Quote
  #185  
Old 11-28-2007, 08:04 PM
rwperu34 rwperu34 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 1,955
Default Re: ***Official 2007-2008 MLB Offseason Thread***

[ QUOTE ]
Rwperu,

[ QUOTE ]
They now need Dukes to stay out of trouble, Baldelli to stay healthy, and Gomes to be good.

[/ QUOTE ]

Why are you saying this?

They need ONE of those THREE players to become a serviceable Right Fielder.

[/ QUOTE ]

They need one in RF and one at DH.
Reply With Quote
  #186  
Old 11-28-2007, 08:08 PM
rwperu34 rwperu34 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 1,955
Default Re: ***Official 2007-2008 MLB Offseason Thread***

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You're looking at it as Garza is better now, and even that's arguable.

[/ QUOTE ]

young is seriously terrible. dude is not going to turn into miguel cabrera.

[/ QUOTE ]

Is this some kind of level?
Reply With Quote
  #187  
Old 11-28-2007, 08:19 PM
SL__72 SL__72 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The gun show.
Posts: 4,023
Default Re: ***Official 2007-2008 MLB Offseason Thread***

I just find Young's walkrate over the last two years to be terribly alarming.
Reply With Quote
  #188  
Old 11-28-2007, 08:19 PM
Thremp Thremp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Free Kyleb
Posts: 10,163
Default Re: ***Official 2007-2008 MLB Offseason Thread***

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You're looking at it as Garza is better now, and even that's arguable.

[/ QUOTE ]

young is seriously terrible. dude is not going to turn into miguel cabrera.

[/ QUOTE ]

Is this some kind of level?

[/ QUOTE ]

Jose Tabata caliber talent obv.
Reply With Quote
  #189  
Old 11-28-2007, 08:27 PM
rwperu34 rwperu34 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 1,955
Default Re: ***Official 2007-2008 MLB Offseason Thread***

[ QUOTE ]
I just find Young's walkrate over the last two years to be terribly alarming.

[/ QUOTE ]

Obviously it's a red flag and Young is not the sure fire HOFer that some people made him out to be. Still, thanks to his tools, he's still got a bunch of superduperstar at the top of his range, it's just no lock. His floor is pretty high also. For example, his EV is still greater than guys like Adam Jones and Jay Bruce while those guys EV is greater than Garza.
Reply With Quote
  #190  
Old 11-28-2007, 08:42 PM
Thremp Thremp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Free Kyleb
Posts: 10,163
Default Re: ***Official 2007-2008 MLB Offseason Thread***

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I just find Young's walkrate over the last two years to be terribly alarming.

[/ QUOTE ]

Obviously it's a red flag and Young is not the sure fire HOFer that some people made him out to be. Still, thanks to his tools, he's still got a bunch of superduperstar at the top of his range, it's just no lock. His floor is pretty high also. For example, his EV is still greater than guys like Adam Jones and Jay Bruce while those guys EV is greater than Garza.

[/ QUOTE ]

Meh. EV isn't that important with prospects. Also you seem fixated on "toolsy" guys. Not dudes who play baseball really good. Which seems a much better indicator of success.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.