Quit poker because of bad luck?

[EgoSlasher]

Low winrate=high variance

[IHateCats]

If he's down that much on his all in's he'd be down overall, not making the $3/hr he's claiming, that makes his #'s even less credible. Obviously some people have had more short term 'luck' than others but how many hands do you think he's had to play to be all in 1k times? The #'s in his post simply don't add up so I'm not inclined to give it much credibility that he's calculated his sklansky bucks honestly/correctly either.

[emil3000]

[ QUOTE ]
Low winrate=high variance

[/ QUOTE ]
No.

[igetbadbeat]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Low winrate=high variance

[/ QUOTE ]
No.

[/ QUOTE ]

No that's not the case? or no that's not true?

[Eagles]

Does anyone actually believe anything in the OP?
The only thing that might be true is
"I'm thinking about giving up poker."

[HP]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Low winrate=high variance

[/ QUOTE ]
No.

[/ QUOTE ]

he probably means variance to EV ratio LDO

[SEABEAST]

[ QUOTE ]

ades you're out of your element here. do you know anything about elementary rush theory, or the comeback probablility cycle?

suffice it to say, he's due.

[/ QUOTE ]

omg LOL [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]

[TresDeuce]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

ades you're out of your element here. do you know anything about elementary rush theory, or the comeback probablility cycle?

suffice it to say, he's due.

[/ QUOTE ]

omg LOL [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

[TheMadHeater]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i certainly wouldnt give up, OP. sooner or later you're due for a SICK UPSWING!

[/ QUOTE ]

It's not exactly like he's more probable to hit a rush than anyone else.....

[/ QUOTE ]

ades you're out of your element here. do you know anything about elementary rush theory, or the comeback probablility cycle?

suffice it to say, he's due.

[/ QUOTE ]


Solid.

[Superman26gt]

[ QUOTE ]
WHATS UR SCREENANEM

[/ QUOTE ]

You're most likely broke on sklansky bucks too. My friend is exactly like you. Seriously though, read.