#281
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Absolute Cliffsnotes (Mod edit: AP thread, part 2)
[ QUOTE ]
I actually agree that the fact that his account isn't locked is really bad. Not so much for the suspected cheating, but for the really really obvious chip dumping he did afew days ago. Absolute and Full tilt lock accounts all the time on the drop of a pin for even suspected chip dumping, so why is his account still active? This is not looking good for absolute IMHO. [/ QUOTE ] perhaps the superuser account can break through account locks in a single bound? |
#282
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Absolute Cliffsnotes (Mod edit: AP thread, part 2)
what if hes a psychic? should he still be allowed to play poker?
|
#283
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Absolute Cliffsnotes (Mod edit: AP thread, part 2)
All of these hands are sick. Good find and it's a DAMN good time for p5's to start being productive.
|
#284
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Absolute Cliffsnotes (Mod edit: AP thread, part 2)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] or it could just be that the cards are breaking even now, while before he was running hot [/ QUOTE ] Lol, you mean he runs totally ridiculously hot with an INFINITE river aggression factor averaging 100-200 bb/100 over the 1000 or so hands that we had aggregated against him also averaging 95 percent or so VPIP, 25 percent WSD, and 50 percent W$SD, then as soon as the thread accusing him of cheating pops up his stats immediately reverse? Yeah, that must be it. [/ QUOTE ] Leveled [/ QUOTE ] lol. There's a first time for everything. [/ QUOTE ] I srsrly thought you were going for the double reverse level. |
#285
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Absolute Cliffsnotes (Mod edit: AP thread, part 2)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I think people saying it was bad for poker were saying it would be better if nobody cheated AP in the first place. [/ QUOTE ] There are definitely people thinking it (this getting out) is going to have a very bad impact on the health of the games. I thought this going public could have a really bad impact myself, but after some thought I really don't think much is going to change in the games on non-Absolute Poker sites. [/ QUOTE ] I 100% agree, look at the scandals online poker has already seen. Pokerspot, Planets RNG cracked, Multi-accounting and the FTP bot thread. Non of these really affected online poker and I dont think this is going to be any different. Is it scary and a wakeup call, to what could possibly happen? Obviously it is, But the sky is not falling |
#286
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Absolute Cliffsnotes (Mod edit: AP thread, part 2)
Another theory that explains everything is that these guys were bad players who woke up one day accidentally (though some weird glitch) able to see other players hole cards. It's like FREAKY FRIDAY lol.
Bonus code iggy imo. |
#287
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Absolute Cliffsnotes
[ QUOTE ]
Here's another hand that goes against the theory: [/ QUOTE ] edited out because that hand was 4 months old |
#288
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Absolute Cliffsnotes (Mod edit: AP thread, part 2)
[ QUOTE ]
Can you explain how the Heisenberg uncertainty principle is relevant? [/ QUOTE ] It explains why he was losing tonight. All of those observers changed his results. |
#289
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Absolute Cliffsnotes (Mod edit: AP thread, part 2)
The cash game hands with GREYCAT and DOUBLEDRAG are way, way more damning than these tournament hands.
The only one in your post that's really a stretch is the Q3. POTRIPPER could just be a sicko LAG making good reads/getting very lucky. I'm pretty sure a HH of my 2nd place finish in the Super Tuesday would look just as suspicious (I play every hand). |
#290
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Absolute Cliffsnotes (Mod edit: AP thread, part 2)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Can you explain how the Heisenberg uncertainty principle is relevant? [/ QUOTE ] It explains why he was losing tonight. All of those observers changed his results. [/ QUOTE ] heh |
|
|