Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > MTT Community

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 11-29-2007, 07:36 AM
inyourface inyourface is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 480
Default Re: Chris Vaughn BluffMag multiaccounting

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
well the winner of last weeks sunday million on stars will be receiving a very nice surprise soon im sure...details soon i imagine

[/ QUOTE ]

why? because you think, even if he did sell his seat in the first tourney, that he would do the same thing a week later? After a reputable poster already said they were staking him.

please. This is getting out of hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

You being a tiresome douchebag arguing black is white is also getting tiresome. The way you defend cheaters is nauseating
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 11-29-2007, 09:40 AM
getterdone36 getterdone36 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 138
Default Re: Chris Vaughn BluffMag multiaccounting

http://www.poker-king.com/poker-king...hp?article=314
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 11-29-2007, 09:44 AM
gobbomom gobbomom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: gobboville
Posts: 1,753
Default Re: Chris Vaughn BluffMag multiaccounting

that's a great article. And I really, really wish that Sorel would defend himself and say that it isn't true. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

So sad.

edit, also to In your face: your comment is completely untrue and out of line.
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 11-29-2007, 09:56 AM
inyourface inyourface is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 480
Default Re: Chris Vaughn BluffMag multiaccounting

[ QUOTE ]
edit, also to In your face: your comment is completely untrue and out of line.

[/ QUOTE ]

So you too think that naming and shaming cheaters is 'getting out of hand'?

This coming from the same ActionJeff that publicly condemns multiaccounters but has decided to keep the damning evidence to himself. I assume for the good of the MTT community?

Please tell me how what I have said here is souring to hear?
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 11-29-2007, 09:58 AM
syndr0me syndr0me is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 144
Default Re: Chris Vaughn BluffMag multiaccounting

I agree with G2CU here, i dont even care if they say its ok or not. Just have some clearly outlined stance about the issue.
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 11-29-2007, 10:07 AM
VPIP100 VPIP100 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 1,636
Default Re: Chris Vaughn BluffMag multiaccounting

Sick kongs, I was railing while playing the main FTOPS event and saw you got disconnected alot so I thought you were fixing it somehow. (there must be a way to get a reliable internet connection in barca, even in the middle of the night).

After I got 2 outed with an healthy stack on the bubble I stopped railing, and was happy for you with your sick score. Didnt know you got disconnected.

Anyways, does this mean you will be nr 1 then? Time for a sick party?
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 11-29-2007, 10:27 AM
gobbomom gobbomom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: gobboville
Posts: 1,753
Default Re: Chris Vaughn BluffMag multiaccounting

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
edit, also to In your face: your comment is completely untrue and out of line.

[/ QUOTE ]

So you too think that naming and shaming cheaters is 'getting out of hand'?

This coming from the same ActionJeff that publicly condemns multiaccounters but has decided to keep the damning evidence to himself. I assume for the good of the MTT community?

Please tell me how what I have said here is souring to hear?

[/ QUOTE ]

no, I think that naming and shaming them seems to be the only recourse at this point. I also think that Jeff's response is fine. No one wants to see a witch-hunt, or people being accused of cheating with no evidence. Agreeing that research is needed is hardly condoning it. Chris's FTP win was disqualified, so I'm not sure why you think he kept any damning evidence to himself. Anyway, Jeff can respond to this himself; I just thought you could see where your thought processes need re-evaluation in the meantime.
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 11-29-2007, 10:35 AM
THEOSU THEOSU is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: being awesome. duh.
Posts: 7,784
Default Re: Chris Vaughn BluffMag multiaccounting

i was thinking it'd been a while since a good dramabomb.
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 11-29-2007, 10:43 AM
inyourface inyourface is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 480
Default Re: Chris Vaughn BluffMag multiaccounting

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
edit, also to In your face: your comment is completely untrue and out of line.

[/ QUOTE ]

So you too think that naming and shaming cheaters is 'getting out of hand'?

This coming from the same ActionJeff that publicly condemns multiaccounters but has decided to keep the damning evidence to himself. I assume for the good of the MTT community?

Please tell me how what I have said here is souring to hear?

[/ QUOTE ]

Chris's FTP win was disqualified, so I'm not sure why you think he kept any damning evidence to himself.

[/ QUOTE ]

From this thread - http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...rt=all&vc=1

comes this quote as the synopsis -

[ QUOTE ]
That's it. You know who you are, I know who you are, and if you really have the nerve to keep doing this crap out of greed and disrespect for the rules, then you better at least not tell one [censored] person, because you are putting a lot of faith in your peers right now, and not all of them are as considerate and discreet as I am.

-Jeff

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not trying to turn this thread against Jeff but it's ironic and getting annoying seeing him up there on the moral high ground.
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 11-29-2007, 11:59 AM
Eagles Eagles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Saving the season
Posts: 8,324
Default Re: Chris Vaughn BluffMag multiaccounting

BTW without knowing many specifics I will add this. I met Chris in Vegas once he was a very nice guy, most people I know who have met him say the same thing. Assuming the info in this thread is correct, people need to realize that 250k or w/e is a lot of money and for someone like Chris who is a writer not a poker player it is easy to understand why he would want to reduce variance and ensure he makes a lot of money, and letting somebody buy his account does not make him a scumbag.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.