|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: KQ top 2
[ QUOTE ]
I'm betting literally any turn card here. [/ QUOTE ] you bet a heart turn card? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: KQ top 2
i check here when alot of draws just hit villain
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: KQ top 2
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I'm betting literally any turn card here. [/ QUOTE ] you bet a heart turn card? [/ QUOTE ] Oops, missed the FD. I'd probably check and call a reasonable river bet. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: KQ top 2
Nobody bets here? On the flop, your SPR was 4.4 against a loose player and you have top 2.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: KQ top 2
I bet 40 here and fold to any aggression.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: KQ top 2
[ QUOTE ]
I bet 40 here and fold to any aggression. [/ QUOTE ] id bet 30 here but also fold to any aggression |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: KQ top 2
I check, call a reasonable bet on the river; probably check behind river, although one of my weaknesses is missing out on value on the river, I'm not sure if this is one of those cases...
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: KQ top 2
If river checks to us, we need to value-bet. (On good rivers, that is)
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: KQ top 2
If river is checked, not value betting is horrible. I probably check turn, call/bet river.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: KQ top 2
Check the turn behind, re-eval river. He doesn't have a flush/straight here as often as you think, but on the opposite end of the spectrum betting this turn will fold out everything we crush and only get action from the hands that beat us.
|
|
|