Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17  
Old 11-26-2007, 10:49 AM
moorobot moorobot is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,038
Default Re: A Critique of Rothbardian Natural Rights (sorta long)

Could you reply to my criticism I made of your argument about intentions earlier?

[ QUOTE ]
But Marxism is proven false both logically and empirically whereas ACism is not

[/ QUOTE ] Marxists do not agree with this, just as I think AC is proven false both logically and empirically (not directly, but through empirical observations of human behavior we can predict what would happen if AC was instituted) and you do not. They say that none of those countries follow Marx's theory and/or were not really socialist, for example.

[ QUOTE ]
change my mind if you can prove why I'm wrong to me

[/ QUOTE ] That's just the problem: for you, and for other rationalist utopians, there is no logical or empirical claim that can be said that will lead them to subjectively believe they have been "proven wrong".
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.