Just don't seem right

[AE6]

So I see a bunch of little differences between my stats at 50NL and 100NL. Which ones are actually making the huge difference in my win rate? I'm getting pretty frustrated because I keep giving up immediate equity to play at the 100s thinking eventually it'll be worth it $wise but so far it hasn't. Fwiw I haven't really made any conscious changes between the two levels. It just doesn't really make much sense... [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[Abramovic]

What site are you playing at?
Have you got a graph of your time at 100NL? Have you suffered some ugly downswings?

I think we need more information to provide any sort of reason why you arent winning big at 100NL. You can tell by these stats that you arent doing a lot wrong, particularly preflop. I think post flop becomes much more important at 100NL, and its easy to spew, particularly with cbets which would work at 50NL but might get floated or raised at 100NL.

From these stats, you know that no one can tell you what's going wrong. Everything looks solid.

[mooney]

You have too small a sample size at NL 50. I've had break even stretches close to 16k hands...

I suspect your true winrate is somewhere closer to 3-5 PTBB/100 at NL50 and 1-3 at NL100

[jk3a]

[ QUOTE ]
You have too small a sample size at NL 50. I've had break even stretches close to 16k hands...

I suspect your true winrate is somewhere closer to 3-5 PTBB/100 at NL50 and 1-3 at NL100

[/ QUOTE ]

[AE6]

100NL:



50NL:



you're probably right though that not much can really be surmised from these stats. i guess i really just posted out of frustration. sorry guys, i will keep reading here and looking for leaks and hopefully things will start to get a little better for me at 100NL.