#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Resteal problem solving (stars 100r)
[ QUOTE ]
I don't like 3-betting light too much with these stack sizes. With 12-30BB, you can make a resteal allin or essentially so. With 70-110BB, it is hard for villain to 4-bet, since he winds up playing for all his chips, which is an overbet. Here, you give villain a possible reraise allin and you have a tricky situation OOP if he flat calls. I don't think the 3-bet is bad, but I wouldn't do it without a specific reason. [/ QUOTE ] The basic reasons for this particular one was the frequency of his LP raises, and the fact that i had a very good reraising image, as the only hands i'd shown down, even with open raises, had been big ones. Plus this guys 13/10 numbers mean's he raises a fair bit, but almost never calls. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Resteal problem solving (stars 100r)
wheter or not some people would do it PF or not
i certainly dont mind it every now and then we are here now on the flop so we need a plan now i would basicly c-bet all flops that arent Q-high or 8-High or 4-flush check raise all Q-high and 8-high and flops check call a 4 flush board in case you get called or reraised im done with the hand in case of a 4 flush board and you check call i c/f a blank turn in case you made a flush i would bet potsize in case its check check i would c-bet any blank turn and bet half pot size on a made flush |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Resteal problem solving (stars 100r)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] you're 3betting here just to 3bet also, sizing is poor and so are effective stacks to do this with as you're too deep to c/shove flops, and you're going to end up seeing a turn card a lot with like 4xPSB effective stacks [/ QUOTE ] I concur completely, unless of course the button has been thinking it's way too soft in your camp. [/ QUOTE ] I don't understand why you guys are against 3 betting light. If villian is decent at all his opening range will be fairly wide here (yes, even for a 13/10). Therefore 3 betting light some of the time is +EV by itself. Btw given the stack size stacks and that you are out of position I prefer a raise in the 3400-3800 range. [/ QUOTE ] I am not against 3 betting light (if that means having a light hand.) His PF re-steal was too low for the villains stack size (IMO), and you're still giving him like a tad over 2:1 to call here. I question what the motive of the 3 bet was, if it was to make villain fold I think we need to raise it to like 5k. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Resteal problem solving (stars 100r)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I don't like 3-betting light too much with these stack sizes. With 12-30BB, you can make a resteal allin or essentially so. With 70-110BB, it is hard for villain to 4-bet, since he winds up playing for all his chips, which is an overbet. Here, you give villain a possible reraise allin and you have a tricky situation OOP if he flat calls. I don't think the 3-bet is bad, but I wouldn't do it without a specific reason. [/ QUOTE ] The basic reasons for this particular one was the frequency of his LP raises, and the fact that i had a very good reraising image, as the only hands i'd shown down, even with open raises, had been big ones. Plus this guys 13/10 numbers mean's he raises a fair bit, but almost never calls. [/ QUOTE ] If he never calls, i.e. your objective is primarily to get a PF fold, you still should raise to more than 3k here, no? Unless I'm missing somehting you are giving him 2:1, so unless he puts your range virgin tight, you SHOULD be getting called and playing OOP. I don't play the $100r, but I assume these players typically understand hand ranges and equity against them. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Resteal problem solving (stars 100r)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I don't like 3-betting light too much with these stack sizes. With 12-30BB, you can make a resteal allin or essentially so. With 70-110BB, it is hard for villain to 4-bet, since he winds up playing for all his chips, which is an overbet. Here, you give villain a possible reraise allin and you have a tricky situation OOP if he flat calls. I don't think the 3-bet is bad, but I wouldn't do it without a specific reason. [/ QUOTE ] The basic reasons for this particular one was the frequency of his LP raises, and the fact that i had a very good reraising image, as the only hands i'd shown down, even with open raises, had been big ones. Plus this guys 13/10 numbers mean's he raises a fair bit, but almost never calls. [/ QUOTE ] You mean he almsot never calls a reraise? How can you tell that from the numbers? Or do you mean he rarely limps? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Resteal problem solving (stars 100r)
PAHUD has a stat called "attempt to steal". It's how often someone opens when folded to in CO or BU. Put this on your HUD, and when you're considering a light 3-bet, check that the ATS isn't too low (20's probably about normal) and the VPIP is reasonable.
The fact that he's a 13/10 can mean a ton of [censored] here without that stat. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Resteal problem solving (stars 100r)
is there any way to filter this so the % numbers aren't weighted down by all the times someone gets it folded to them CO early in the tourney? I don't really give a rip what thier ATS percent is then, bubble time, yeah, but we can observe that.
|
|
|