|
|
#91
09-24-2007, 09:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] as soon as the Pats clinch home field advantage for the playoffs, Belichick will back off [/ QUOTE ] I'd believe this about most teams, but the Pats have already won 3 SBs. If they have a shot at going undefeated they'll go for it, even if it puts them at a greater risk of getting someone hurt and blowing it. Historically speaking, the difference between 3 Pats SBs and 4 is going to be almost nil in 20 years. If they go undefeated they'll have another jewel in the crown. [/ QUOTE ] agreed completely. 
|
|
#92
09-24-2007, 09:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
I was talking about the day after the Randy Moss trade, big deal they are heads and shouldersd better than any other team if they lose it is due to refs.
|
|
#93
09-24-2007, 09:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
[ QUOTE ]
People who are outright dismissing the possiblity of the Pats going 16-0 are morons. Obviously the odds aren't in their favor, but it's still possible. It would be amazing if it happens because that would really shut the haters up. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] How exactly would it "shut the haters up"? Who isn't giving props to the Pats? If you sticked to non-Boston related sports topics, you'd be a much better poster.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
