|
|
#1
01-30-2007, 05:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
$16t: Turned flush on first hand
This is two-pair/set/lower flush/random hand enough to push for value right? I think there's a ton of worse hands he'll call with.
PokerStars Tournament, Big Blind is t20 (9 handed) Converter on pregopoker.com UTG (t1500) UTG+1 (t1500) MP1 (t1500) MP2 (t1500) MP3 (t1500) CO (t1500) Button (t1500) Hero (t1500) BB (t1500) Preflop: Hero is in SB with 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="gray">UTG folds</font>, <font color="gray">UTG+1 folds</font>, <font color="gray">MP1 folds</font>, <font color="gray">MP2 folds</font>, <font color="gray">MP3 folds</font>, <font color="gray">CO folds</font>, Button calls t20, Hero calls t10, BB checks Flop: (t60) 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (3 players) Hero checks, BB checks, Button checks Turn: (t60) Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (3 players) <font color="red">Hero bets t40</font>, BB calls t40, <font color="gray">Button folds</font> River: (t140) 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 players) <font color="red">Hero bets t110</font>, <font color="red">BB raises to t400</font> 
|
|
#4
01-30-2007, 05:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $16t: Turned flush on first hand
My line usually is checked flop bet turn, check/call the river I'm definitely calling the river as played. IMO in general Pudge Advice > BHokie Advice I'm interested on Pudge's reasons for betting the flop, maybe because only the button limped and he obviously doesn't have a strong hand. If you bet the flop do you bet the turn when you hit or c/c, if you miss the turn I assume it's an easy c/f.
|
|
#5
01-30-2007, 06:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $16t: Turned flush on first hand
Calling wasn't even a question, of course I'm calling the river. Re-re-raise all-in for value is the question. I really think this is sets, two pair, or lower flushes enough that pay-off a push.
|
|
#6
01-30-2007, 06:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $16t: Turned flush on first hand
[ QUOTE ]
Calling wasn't even a question, of course I'm calling the river. Re-re-raise all-in for value is the question. I really think this is sets, two pair, or lower flushes enough that pay-off a push. [/ QUOTE ] I'd defintely push. Since villan was the BB I think a random two pair hand is even more likely.
|
|
#7
01-30-2007, 06:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $16t: Turned flush on first hand
[ QUOTE ]
Calling wasn't even a question, of course I'm calling the river. Re-re-raise all-in for value is the question. I really think this is sets, two pair, or lower flushes enough that pay-off a push. [/ QUOTE ] This early I wouldn't, the times you bust don't make up for the times you get stacked IMO. It's a nice take down if you are ahead and you have time to recover if you are behind. This early I'd weigh surviving, over getting stacked.
|
|
#9
01-30-2007, 06:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $16t: Turned flush on first hand
[ QUOTE ]
nit alert [ QUOTE ] the times you bust don't make up for the times you get stacked IMO [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Yeah I'm a total nit early It's the $16s there's a bigger edge late [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
|
#10
01-30-2007, 06:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $16t: Turned flush on first hand
Hate preflop.
Think 60 turn is way better than 40 as well. On river fold is out of the question, and check/call would give up tremendous amounts of value.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
