|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LO8 - AAQ2 with suited ace UTG
[ QUOTE ]
I'd tend to bet more on the flop than you did, but given your description of your opponent, betting as you did seems fine. Buzz [/ QUOTE ] Not to nitpick your analysis, Buzz, but you must have some magic tricks for limit games unavailable to us lowly commoners. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LO8 - AAQ2 with suited ace UTG
Sorry Damocles - "I'd tend to bet more on the flop than you did" doesn't make any sense to me either.
Thanks for catching my error. My apologies. I would tend to bet this flop also, just as Ruggles did. It's a good flop for Hero if KaiserHorst doesn't have a nine. And KaiserHorst is at least unlikely to have a nine. Then when KaiserHorst just calls, he's hard to figure. You would not expect him to fold a hand with a nine after a flop with two nines. Thus if he folds, he doesn't have a nine. However, the opposite is not true. He does not necessarily have a nine if he continues. But then you have to wonder why he would continue without a nine. At any rate, Roggles played the hand exactly as I would have played it. Buzz |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LO8 - AAQ2 with suited ace UTG
[ QUOTE ]
Not to nitpick your analysis, Buzz, but you must have some magic tricks for limit games unavailable to us lowly commoners. [/ QUOTE ] haha, he does, that's why he's Buzz! ldo! heh, you should ask him for his articles. |
|
|