|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: river bluff vs. 2p2er
i was saying that wanting to "take it down" preflop was a joke, but whatever. in any case, i don't really see the preflop discussion going anywhere.
for the purpose of this hand, pretend i have 66 if you want. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: river bluff vs. 2p2er
[ QUOTE ]
i was saying that wanting to "take it down" preflop was a joke, but whatever. in any case, i don't really see the preflop discussion going anywhere. for the purpose of this hand, pretend i have 66 if you want. [/ QUOTE ] 66 is totally different though, in that he is going to vb pairs of 9s 8s and maybe even 7s, an he may not think TT/JJ are in your range here based on pre. I think calling is fine on the river, i dont like that diamonds missed. fwiw i like a flop c/r with a pretty big range here althought i know you hate raising |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: river bluff vs. 2p2er
[ QUOTE ]
i was saying that wanting to "take it down" preflop was a joke, but whatever. in any case, i don't really see the preflop discussion going anywhere. for the purpose of this hand, pretend i have 66 if you want. [/ QUOTE ] 66 is a different because sometimes villain is bluffing a hand like 76 or decided to turn 88/99 into a bluff and then you look like a tool if you call. The same is not true if you have TT. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: river bluff vs. 2p2er
For the purpose of discussion we could consider you had A high b/c you're not getting called by anything you beat and I really think he is calling with most Qs. Your hand looks quite a bit like a busted fd. It sounds like there is enough dynamic b/t you and villain that it is tough for all of us to see how your reasoning is correct. This hand in a vacuum looks kinda weird but it could work out well for you down the road against this guy if he did call.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: river bluff vs. 2p2er
allin on river. i think it's a good bluff because he probably can't put you on a missed draw after you c/c flop.
shove > fold > call imo. calling seems awful, he probably has a queen a lot. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: river bluff vs. 2p2er
[ QUOTE ]
allin on river. i think it's a good bluff because he probably can't put you on a missed draw after you c/c flop. shove > fold > call imo. calling seems awful, he probably has a queen a lot. [/ QUOTE ] a guy with 6af isnt betting a Q that he cc with pre on the turn against a guy who likes calling him down? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: river bluff vs. 2p2er
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] allin on river. i think it's a good bluff because he probably can't put you on a missed draw after you c/c flop. shove > fold > call imo. calling seems awful, he probably has a queen a lot. [/ QUOTE ] a guy with 6af isnt betting a Q that he cc with pre on the turn against a guy who likes calling him down? [/ QUOTE ] more likely a guy with 6af checks QT rather than checking diamonds. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: river bluff vs. 2p2er
fwiw i was villain in this hand and i b/3b value-shoved the river w/ JJ caus thats how i roll
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: river bluff vs. 2p2er
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] allin on river. i think it's a good bluff because he probably can't put you on a missed draw after you c/c flop. shove > fold > call imo. calling seems awful, he probably has a queen a lot. [/ QUOTE ] a guy with 6af isnt betting a Q that he cc with pre on the turn against a guy who likes calling him down? [/ QUOTE ] more likely a guy with 6af checks QT rather than checking diamonds. [/ QUOTE ] a 23/18 guy cc'ing QT with players behind him seems unlikely, also i think diamonds missing are a good reason not to bluff because he can put us on diamonds and call with whatever. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: river bluff vs. 2p2er
[ QUOTE ]
i was saying that wanting to "take it down" preflop was a joke [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, much better to trap OOP with a monster like TT. Plus you hit a set like 40% of the time, right? |
|
|