Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Full Ring
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-10-2007, 03:38 PM
The Rat Pack The Rat Pack is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 35
Default Re: 100NL - QQ facing utg raise

Nice post Albert.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-10-2007, 03:50 PM
spence79 spence79 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 19
Default Re: 100NL - QQ facing utg raise

Thanks guys. My thoughts at the time were very much along the lines of Cheese's post. In the actual hand villian obviously had JJ so I wanted to check I hadn't missed any value.

[ QUOTE ]

Second, it frequently flushes AA and KK out of the bushes. Many players don't like to just call KK-AA to a pfrr OOP. They 4-bet or push.

[/ QUOTE ]

I've stacked off in a couple of similar situations recently to KK/AA calling my 3 bet OOP and letting me bet my stack off. I've also seen a lot of 4 betting AI with 88, AQ, and the odd random hand.

I wasn't happy getting this many BBs all in pre with QQ FR vs UTG, and as my 3 bets rarely seem to be flat-called QQ seemed "too good" to raise/fold and be turning into a bluff 90% of the time.

Your post makes a lot of sense tho. Perhaps I'm underestimating the % of time I'll be flat-called here. I guess I'll go back to usually reraising this pre and then see how I'm doing in these situations next week. (after another 25k hands)

Albert, you say you "usually" reraise this pre. Do you mean like an 80/20 split and you think the plays are fairly close with reraising being a little better? Or do you think reraising is clearly superior?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-10-2007, 04:07 PM
Das Budrick Das Budrick is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Isla Vista
Posts: 1,838
Default Re: 100NL - QQ facing utg raise

I'm not raising this flop for information, I'm raising it for value. I reraise preflop almost every time unless we have weird history. I think you played this hand way too passively, every street as played should be a raise or a bet. When you were checked to on the turn, value bet. I guess it's just a matter of style, but I play this much more aggressively. It's easy to dump if he really comes alive and shoves or something but imo you're just missing too much value by checking and smoothcalling.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-10-2007, 04:21 PM
BalancePoint BalancePoint is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 37
Default Re: 100NL - QQ facing utg raise

I would reraise PF.

Value bet the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-10-2007, 04:42 PM
King Spew King Spew is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,080
Default Re: 100NL - QQ facing utg raise

16/7..... I'm rr PF with position. Always.

As played, weak sauce to the flop, weak sauce to the river. You lost value. Not a bad thing per se,,,, just not very good either.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-10-2007, 05:16 PM
AllTheCheese AllTheCheese is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 508
Default Re: 100NL - QQ facing utg raise

For those saying he lost value, would Villain play AA or KK any differently? Doubtful. A turn bet is a donation against his check-calling/check-raising range unless we know he's gonna check-call 99 here. A 16/7 has AT like never ever here.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.