Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Brick and Mortar
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 06-12-2007, 06:02 PM
Rottersod Rottersod is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Where I Want To Be
Posts: 3,154
Default Re: \"Un-mucking\" a mucked hand

Seems to me that the OP's story it was a dead hand and she shouldn't have been awarded the pot. As Rick pointed out she didn't know she had the winning hand and she didn't table her hand, she went to muck it and flashed it to the table so they could see. So it falls under the one person to a hand rule.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-12-2007, 07:23 PM
hayduke hayduke is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 56
Default Re: \"Un-mucking\" a mucked hand

Sounds as if there was no dispute that she did indeed have the 7s, and therefore had the winning hand. It’s unclear whether she properly tabled either of the cards.

It’s also unclear whether the player with the X high flush tabled both her cards.

Since no one at the table is disputing that the player showed a straight flush, I think it is clearly in the best interest of the game to award the pot to that player. (Along with a warning about protecting her hand.)

In my experience, most floor people at Foxwoods rule that the muck has magical hand-killing properties. Therefore, the odds are that if a floor had been called, the straight flush would have been ruled dead. On the other hand, Foxwoods does have some floor people who do not believe in magical mucks. I have seen them rule that a player who flashes the winning hand and unknowingly mucks it is still entitled to the pot in the best interest of the game. (I long ago gave up trying to find out what the room’s “official” rule, if any, is on this point.)
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-12-2007, 09:17 PM
soah soah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 20,529
Default Re: \"Un-mucking\" a mucked hand

There is nothing unclear. The OP says "face down".
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-13-2007, 05:39 AM
lmcjaho lmcjaho is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 241
Default Re: \"Un-mucking\" a mucked hand

[ QUOTE ]
There is nothing unclear. The OP says "face down".

[/ QUOTE ]

Really? So I suppose all the players who saw the 7 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] were wearing those cool X-Ray glasses then?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 06-13-2007, 05:52 AM
soah soah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 20,529
Default Re: \"Un-mucking\" a mucked hand

some people possess a special skill which allows them to view objects even when they are not laying on a table
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 06-13-2007, 06:31 PM
Al_Capone_Junior Al_Capone_Junior is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: utility muffin research kitchen
Posts: 5,766
Default Re: \"Un-mucking\" a mucked hand

I always hate to see the best hand lose on a technicality. Any hand that has been turned face up and is abviously the winning hand should never lose on a technicality or dealer error.

On the other hand, turned face up means both hole cards visible on the cameras, as well as your neighbors.

In either case the dealer has no business retrieving mucked cards, and was WAY out of line not calling the floor.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.