|
|
#1
09-30-2006, 03:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
KK HU with weird aggro action
UTG is 16/9.3/2.60 after 43 hands
Since it was HU, my plan was to c/r the turn, which didn't quite work out like I planned. Party Poker ($1/$2 limit). Hand converted by Check Raised hand converter Preflop (9 players): Hero is UTG+1 with K  K UTG calls [2.5:1]. HERO 2 bets. 7 folds. UTG calls [5.5:1]. Flop (5.5 small bets ($5.5) in pot, 2 players): 5  3 Q UTG checks. HERO bets. UTG 2 bets. HERO calls [9.5:1]. Turn (4.75 bets ($9.5) in pot, 2 players): 5 3 Q 5UTG checks. HERO bets. UTG 2 bets. HERO 3 bets. UTG calls [10.75:1]. River (10.75 bets ($21.5) in pot, 2 players): 5 3 Q 5 9UTG checks. HERO bets. UTG calls [12.75:1]. 
|
|
#2
09-30-2006, 03:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KK HU with weird aggro action
3-jack that flop (you weak-tight nit).
Edited to make insult optional. Just as a note: all my insults are meant as jokes. I am not trying to be a jerk or anything.
|
|
#3
09-30-2006, 03:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KK HU with weird aggro action
Why is 3 betting the flop preferable to c/r the turn?
|
|
#4
09-30-2006, 03:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KK HU with weird aggro action
I generally prefer getting as much money in possible as early as possible when I'm likely ahead. Your villain is a nitty TAG, you'll either get called here and then called down the rest of the way, or it'll get capped and you'll know you're in trouble. Either way I think the hand is easier to play like this. You don't lose EV by not going for a turn check-raise against this opponent, as he'll likely fold if he's beaten, but you'll lose more when you're behind.
|
|
#7
09-30-2006, 04:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KK HU with weird aggro action
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] You can't C/R the turn since you are last to act... [/ QUOTE ] Yet another reason! [/ QUOTE ] Okay, yes, brain fart when posting. Was playing at the same time. Re-phrase: why 3 betting the flop preferable to waiting for the turn to raise, Doc? Edit: answered. Nevermind.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
