|
|
#12
11-29-2007, 04:25 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: so you\'re 61/33, sir
[ QUOTE ]
Well, IMO I dont think its that bad, with his aggro factor, your prob good here about 60% of the time. But Id find me a better spot, and there will be. Becouse you dont need to gamble with this guy. [/ QUOTE ] Lol why gamble with anybody then 
|
|
#13
11-29-2007, 04:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: so you\'re 61/33, sir
Whose the fish again?
|
|
#15
11-29-2007, 09:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: so you\'re 61/33, sir
[ QUOTE ]
Well, IMO I dont think its that bad, with his aggro factor, your prob good here about 60% of the time. But Id find me a better spot, and there will be. Becouse you dont need to gamble with this guy. [/ QUOTE ] You have a meh hand with a bad kicker in a re-raised pot. Its not against the rules for this guy to have a hand; What's his re-raising range preflop from the BB? Got to be something less than 33%, so you probably started behind. The flop was meh, OK, then the turn sucked and now you want to play for stacks? If I though it was 60/40 then I'd make the solid investment. This ain't 60/40. Its worse. he may be going to town with 22-55, but the same is true for 77 -10-10 and random (censored) that did or did not hit the flop. Alot of Broadway junk that makes up this idiots range hit a K or a J.
|
|
#16
11-29-2007, 11:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: so you\'re 61/33, sir
I find that for a super donkey to full pot shove anything is really suspect (most of the time they want a call and don't want to scare you away). Depending on villain, I could see myself calling this if I had seen him trying to "value bet" rivers where he actually turned up with a hand.
Based on stats alone I guess you fold here, but its not as clear cut as some are saying. Turn seems to be the place for the fold also.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
