#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200/400 against Genius28
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Him shoving for value with KQ is likely but improbable. [/ QUOTE ] Is that like a two-way probability? [/ QUOTE ] I meant probable but unlikely. [/ QUOTE ] looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool quoted for in case he edits it. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200/400 against Genius28
Probably a set with an outside chance of 87 (but he bets more on the turn with 87 I guess?).
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200/400 against Genius28
I love the way you just decipher these nosebleed palyers hands with jsut their bet sizing on one street.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200/400 against Genius28
Given you checked that turn, I cannot imagine folding this on that river.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200/400 against Genius28
this thread is retarded
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200/400 against Genius28
[ QUOTE ]
this thread is retarded [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] All he ever did was post worthless 1-word sentences in other people's strategy threads. [/ QUOTE ] |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200/400 against Genius28
If you take this line on turn - is it not max value from his rivetbets the times you are ahead. My point being that when you c/c turn on this board, you have to call river also?
This is - ofc- higher than my usual game, but did you feel that leading turn was worse than taking the passive approach?. Also - why have people stopped making constructive posts in these threads ? The mods really need to get back in the game, cause all these 1 line replies are ruining the forum. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200/400 against Genius28
I cannot see him not shoving KQ for value, KJ is prob borderline - I know I would shove it given your weak line.
U really gotta call this IMO. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200/400 against Genius28
how is this anything but a turbo call seriously
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200/400 against Genius28
Its close between routine call and scream "gotcha b!tch" then call.
|
|
|