|
|
#3
10-12-2007, 03:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ctrl+v
One thing that has greatly reduced my stress levels has been quitting as a moderator (and reading altogether) the TwoPlusTwo forums. Wasting my time, energy, and effort on that site is really distracting me from stuff I should be getting done, work-related or not. 
|
|
#4
10-12-2007, 03:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ctrl+v
JayA21: AJ def good to a 3 bet sir
the_limpest: thx, im new to this game the_limpest: teach me more Dealer: JayA21 shows [8h 5c] Dealer: HydroidOne shows [Ad Kc] Dealer: JayA21 shows a full house, Fives full of Jacks Dealer: HydroidOne shows two pair, Jacks and Fives Dealer: JayA21 wins the pot (10,410) with a full house, Fives full of Jacks JayA21: give me that brendo27 (Observer): shut it jay the_limpest: JayA, please teach me more the_limpest: i need to learn brendo27 (Observer): ur a disgrace JayA21: blow me
|
|
#5
10-12-2007, 03:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ctrl+v
|
|
#6
10-12-2007, 03:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ctrl+v
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Sounds like an unbiased opinion to me! [/ QUOTE ] Not more biased than any quotes from NRA and similar organizations! [/ QUOTE ] So your counter to bias is more bias? Also, LOL at your "source". Listen to this whopper: [ QUOTE ] Claim 2. Armed robberies are up by a "whopping" 44% since the new laws. In fact the rate of armed robbery increase dropped 12% in 1998. [/ QUOTE ] These two statements are not mutually exclusive, DUCY? Plus, data-cherry-picking FTW.       NOW REMEMBER, your statement that I asked for a cite on was this: [ QUOTE ] Were all crimes with, or without, guns, eliminated? NO, in either cases, but they were reduced! [/ QUOTE ] Please provide a source that backs this statement. The one you've provided does not, since it acknowleges that crime increased after the new austrailian gun laws. Continuing on... [ QUOTE ] Lets put it this way. You favor unlimited gun ownership and you are in a room with a totally deranged person (they do exists). You would say that in the name of freedom you would like, or not object to, him to have a gun!? [/ QUOTE ] Why do I have to be compelled to be in a room with other people? I probably wouldn't want him to have a baseball bat, or knitting needles, or a fork, either. Yet another case of jumping to edge-case scenarios (locked in an enclosed space with a "total nutcase") to justify impositions in the general case. If everyone were derranged and everyone were locked in rooms with other people, you might be on to something! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] <-- I'm going to start taking a page from the RedBean/Midge Secret Trolling Handbook and start using more smart-ass statements, of course dding a "!" and a "  " to the end.And since these people DO exist, I am certainly *entitled* to defend myself from them. Since these people DO manage to get guns (your precious gun control doesn't magically make them impossible to obtain) I certainly see a need for myself to have access to defensive measures. Now, putting ALL of that aside, can you please explain why I need *your* permission in the first place? [/ QUOTE ]
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
