Full Ring : which site to choose

[TheProdigy]

FTP is laggy and not very good software.

The best software is Stars, and if you want to build a bankroll with some profit + a lot of good bonus, then go for stars.

[MissionToMars]

that sounds good but i mean i wanna play nl100/200 i dont know if stars is fishy enough on that limits.i mean good software is very importent but Fishy players is important to

[TheProdigy]

Stars is fishy enough for anyone to beat nl100/200 if you are half decent [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[MissionToMars]

ok i trust your words and give it a try! anyone knows where to get good pt databases for stars on FR nl100?

[speedle]

[ QUOTE ]
ok i trust your words and give it a try! anyone knows where to get good pt databases for stars on FR nl100?

[/ QUOTE ]

Datamining is forbidden by Stars.

[MissionToMars]

oh ok did not know it ! so i will create my own database :-)

[threads13]

I like FTP. I have rakeback there and it's softer. I still play at Stars some though.

[MissionToMars]

hmm ! i think i will give both sites a try as for my opinion they are the only sites where i can multi table with good software.i am just wandering why is noone talking about ipoker full ring? they have quiet good offers and normaly bad players speaking about sh.

[Phytopath]

iPoker is full of regulars at Full ring, the games especially 100/200 NL are pretty dry nowadays. The short handed games are pretty good though.

OnGame is pretty much the softest site around, next to boss and Pacific, but again not much full ring at Boss and difficult to multi-table at Pacific.

Maybe do something like a few tables at OnGame, Boss and Pacific. The games at Stars/Tilt are waay harder than the euro sites.

[MissionToMars]

i would like to make it but if i start ongame some tables its hard to play on other sites to because of the [censored] ongame software. otherwise i would play more tables on ongame.