|
|
#21
10-28-2007, 05:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
[ QUOTE ]
So OP, can you show these fools I am right? [/ QUOTE ] And incidentally, against a range consisting of QQ+, calling is hardly -EV at all. Add AK which is most def in 95% of villains ranges and it's a no brainer call. 
|
|
#22
10-28-2007, 05:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
[ QUOTE ]
So OP, can you show these fools I am right? [/ QUOTE ] Can you please stop being retarded?
|
|
#23
10-28-2007, 06:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
[ QUOTE ]
OP, Can you please give us Villans hand. I will bet any one of these people he has QQ,KK,AA. [/ QUOTE ] I call quickly, he had JJ, and of course, I am a deep [censored] in coin flip... ty for answers
|
|
#24
10-28-2007, 06:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
[ QUOTE ]
So OP, can you show these fools I am right? [/ QUOTE ] no one ever posts hands where the dude shows up with QQ and then wins the flip. so you know this is a checkup. But just because there's a good chance that this particular hand ended with villain having KK+ doesn't mean that the play isn't fine. edit: too late and wrong... but right at the same time
|
|
#25
10-28-2007, 06:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
LOLOL
|
|
#26
10-28-2007, 06:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
[ QUOTE ]
OP, Can you please give us Villans hand. I will bet any one of these people he has QQ,KK,AA. [/ QUOTE ] this is wrong but his range should be very polarized here.
|
|
#27
10-28-2007, 06:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] OP, Can you please give us Villans hand. I will bet any one of these people he has QQ,KK,AA. [/ QUOTE ] this is wrong but his range should be very polarized here. [/ QUOTE ] Either I don't understand what polarized means or I disagree.
|
|
#28
10-28-2007, 07:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
the pot is offering 2:1. around 600 in the pot we have to call 310
if we put the player on JJ+;AK we have 40-60 % equity if he has KK,AK. 37-63 %. but i he makes this play with QQ+, you have only 30-70% against KK+ its 18-82 % desaster i gave him the QQ+ (maybe KK+) so there is no call here. we need 33% for a call ....
|
|
#30
10-28-2007, 07:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
[ QUOTE ]
the pot is offering 2:1. around 600 in the pot we have to call 310 if we put the player on JJ+;AK we have 40-60 % equity if he has KK,AK. 37-63 %. but i he makes this play with QQ+, you have only 30-70% against KK+ its 18-82 % desaster i gave him the QQ+ (maybe KK+) so there is no call here. we need 33% for a call .... [/ QUOTE ] Against QQ+ we have 31% equity which makes it a slightly bad call. Since that range is ridic tight and should only be used to make my point we have way more equity than that. It's a no brainer call. Stop being retards.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
