#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL600-Super Standard PF?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] yes [/ QUOTE ] QFT I'd fold QQ, too. With KK and AA, I'd call. I suppose I might fold KK if I had a long enough history with the guy that pushed to put him exactly on aces, but I wouldn't tell anybody about it. [/ QUOTE ] Well, I doubt even with those stats that his range is KK+..isn't it more like QQ+, AK and sometimes JJ and sommmmeeeetimes TT but only 5% of the time maybe? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL600-Super Standard PF?
if you think his range is TT+ AK then its an obvious shove.
We think his range to reraise a tight ep raise + call is closer to QQ+ AK weighted toward KK+. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL600-Super Standard PF?
[ QUOTE ]
fold as a general rule, AK is more valuable preflop than QQ. [/ QUOTE ] can you elaborate a bit? I know that AK you can 4/bet and 4/bet shove easier than QQ, thereby increasing FE significantly, but against bad players, isn't QQ better to have since you're usually going to be like 80-20 vs a 50/50 drawing hand when you face the flop? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL600-Super Standard PF?
AK makes it significantly less likely that villain has AA/KK, and fares otherwise the same as QQ against most ranges.
I mean, sure, QQ is gonna dominate some hands that AK isn't, but in terms of being fourbetting value, AK gets more folds than QQ, and gets our money in good more often (by good i mean 45+% equity in the pot). |
|
|