#1
|
|||
|
|||
Timex final table bustout hand 3 handed in stars $320
i was watching this for last hour or so. timex was playing very tight-aggressive up to this point. whats his thinking/rational here? him and villian do have some history. i forgot the details but a little earlier timex got all in verse villian as a 3 to 1 underdog only to river a naked flush and stay alive in the tournament.
PokerStars Game #10777702296: Tournament #54101364, $300+$20 Hold'em No Limit - Level XXIII (7500/15000) - 2007/07/05 - 05:03:00 (ET) Table '54101364 9' 9-max Seat #7 is the button Seat 1: hit21hit (580114 in chips) Seat 7: mkop30 (174722 in chips) Seat 9: BuklaH (545164 in chips) hit21hit: posts the ante 750 mkop30: posts the ante 750 BuklaH: posts the ante 750 BuklaH: posts small blind 7500 hit21hit: posts big blind 15000 *** HOLE CARDS *** mkop30: folds BuklaH: calls 7500 hit21hit: checks *** FLOP *** [Jc 3h 7c] BuklaH: checks hit21hit: bets 22500 BuklaH: raises 506914 to 529414 and is all-in hit21hit: calls 506914 *** TURN *** [Jc 3h 7c] [Th] *** RIVER *** [Jc 3h 7c Th] [Kh] *** SHOW DOWN *** BuklaH: shows [Qh Qc] (a pair of Queens) hit21hit: shows [7d 5d] (a pair of Sevens) BuklaH collected 1091078 from pot *** SUMMARY *** Total pot 1091078 | Rake 0 Board [Jc 3h 7c Th Kh] Seat 1: hit21hit (big blind) showed [7d 5d] and lost with a pair of Sevens Seat 7: mkop30 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 9: BuklaH (small blind) showed [Qh Qc] and won (1091078) with a pair of Queens |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Timex final table bustout hand 3 handed in stars $320
Sometimes timex is...uh.....not good...
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Timex final table bustout hand 3 handed in stars $320
meh, his ability to make big calls like this that are right more often than not is what seperates him from most of you.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Timex final table bustout hand 3 handed in stars $320
he thought his pair was good, wanted to gamble? SB played QQ real sneaky!
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Timex final table bustout hand 3 handed in stars $320
All I can think right now is "aggressive call."
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Timex final table bustout hand 3 handed in stars $320
oh man, i can't believe i get to say this... he put his opponent on AK. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Timex final table bustout hand 3 handed in stars $320
[ QUOTE ]
oh man, i can't believe i get to say this... he put his opponent on A3. [/ QUOTE ] |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Timex final table bustout hand 3 handed in stars $320
This is your standard spite call, and the fact he didn't get there by the river is absurd.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Timex final table bustout hand 3 handed in stars $320
ok not the best call ever. I dunno pay structure but at thsi point it should be similar to a sit and go to some degree, which makes a call like this even worse. You need a pretty decent amount of equity to make this call correct in such a situation. Off the cuff I'd say he needs at least 55-57% equity to breakeven.
Given that we have just about 45% equity in our nearly best case scenario of being up against a flush draw with two overcards, this call just can't be right. Even against a flush card with one overcard, which would be a pretty big surprise here, we have only 55% equity. Of course a decent % of the time we will be completely smashed as well. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Timex final table bustout hand 3 handed in stars $320
Has anybody confirmed this wasn't a misclick?
|
|
|