|
|
#31
11-16-2007, 04:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: If a poker site were to offer insurance on hands backed by the hou
[ QUOTE ]
If you guys think the constant rigged posts on forums are overwhelming your head would explode if you sat in a CS chair for one day. [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I play poker for a living. The only person that is firing me is me! [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] ok, the first post sounded like you work as a CS. Then be glad that your CS handles these types of players well and forces them to return. 
|
|
#32
11-16-2007, 06:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: If a poker site were to offer insurance on hands backed by the hou
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Because then the house would have an interest in the outcome of the hand. That is bad. [/ QUOTE ] ffs read alobars post u retard. [/ QUOTE ] http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...umber=12990483 that's why the interest of the house is bad. period.
|
|
#33
11-16-2007, 06:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: If a poker site were to offer insurance on hands backed by the hou
Slight hijack: Anyone think Stars or Tilt would consider implementing a "run it twice" option in cash games? I suppose it'd slow down games a bit too much, perhaps it could be used at 10/20NL or higher where the money matters more?
|
|
#34
11-16-2007, 06:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: If a poker site were to offer insurance on hands backed by the hou
[ QUOTE ]
Slight hijack: Anyone think Stars or Tilt would consider implementing a "run it twice" option in cash games? I suppose it'd slow down games a bit too much, perhaps it could be used at 10/20NL or higher where the money matters more? [/ QUOTE ] Won't happen. It will slow the games down too much, and that means less money for them.
|
|
#35
11-16-2007, 07:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: If a poker site were to offer insurance on hands backed by the hou
[ QUOTE ]
"run it twice" [/ QUOTE ] LOL double-losing AA against 72 on a A22 flop would induce ultra-tilt resulting in a real insulation and many damaged things and random people [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] Anyway on average it would lover variance (tilt, gambol, enjoyment) = it's bad for poker. Basically anything that prevents the fish to win huuuuuge at least occasionally is a big no no for any hazard game.
|
|
#36
11-17-2007, 12:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: If a poker site were to offer insurance on hands backed by the hou
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Slight hijack: Anyone think Stars or Tilt would consider implementing a "run it twice" option in cash games? I suppose it'd slow down games a bit too much, perhaps it could be used at 10/20NL or higher where the money matters more? [/ QUOTE ] Won't happen. It will slow the games down too much, and that means less money for them. [/ QUOTE ] What if they changed like .25 or something for it. Although you give up a small amount of equity, reducing risk must have some value.
|
|
#38
11-17-2007, 10:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: If a poker site were to offer insurance on hands backed by the hou
[ QUOTE ]
They would make an absolute killing. Just thought you all needed to know that. [/ QUOTE ] TBH, this is an incredibly good idea.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
