Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-01-2007, 12:24 PM
chesspain chesspain is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Southern New Hampshire
Posts: 8,277
Default NL50: Maximizing EV with KK after one player is all-in?

Bodog full-table. The SB has only $17 to start the hand. I have nearly $50, and the LP has me covered. No good reads on anyone in the hand.

Preflop: BB posts $0.50. chesspain is MP with K [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] K [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img].
UTG calls $0.50, UTG+1 calls $0.50, <font color="red">chesspain raises to $3.50</font>, 1 fold, HJ calls $3.50, CO calls $3.50, 1 fold, SB calls $3.50, BB folds, UTG folds, UTG+1 folds.

Flop: ($15.50) Q [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 6 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] J [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] [4 players]
SB checks, <font color="red">chesspain bets $15</font>, HJ calls $15, CO folds, SB calls all-in for $14.40.

Turn: (Active pot=$1.20; side pot=$58.70) 2 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] [2 players + 1 player all-in)
chesspain checks, <font color="red">HJ bets $10</font>, <font color="red">chesspain pushes all-in for $29.50</font>...

Standard?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-01-2007, 12:26 PM
Sir Winalot Sir Winalot is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Suomi-Finland perkele
Posts: 2,468
Default Re: NL50: Maximizing EV with KK after one player is all-in?

IMO open shove turn is superiour to checking.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-01-2007, 12:55 PM
jd2b2006 jd2b2006 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UF....still
Posts: 388
Default Re: NL50: Maximizing EV with KK after one player is all-in?

Open shove the turn. With a pot this big, giving villain a possible free card is a crime.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-01-2007, 01:07 PM
SCBielski SCBielski is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Grinding it out in Boston
Posts: 460
Default Re: NL50: Maximizing EV with KK after one player is all-in?

[ QUOTE ]
IMO open shove turn is superiour to checking.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-01-2007, 04:13 PM
Pokey Pokey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Using the whole Frist, doc?
Posts: 3,712
Default Re: NL50: Maximizing EV with KK after one player is all-in?

[ QUOTE ]
IMO open shove turn is superiour to checking.

[/ QUOTE ]

You can't open-shove the turn, though....the active pot has only $1 in it. What calls this bet that chesspain beats? Maybe a heart draw, but even there villain's not getting proper odds. Probably AQ calls. Other than that, nada. Given the preflop raise that got called, we can rule out most Q's and J's as likely possibilities. Villain should know that we're not betting into this pot unimproved because it's protected and we'd stand to win nothing. I think that against an open-push villain's calling range beats ours: hands like QQ, JJ, 66 that have us drawing nearly dead, hands like QJs that have us drawing quite thin, and hands like A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] x[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] that have 12 outs against us. You have to throw in a heapin' helpin' of AQ/AJ before this becomes a +EV push.

Now, if you check you stand to win CONSIDERABLY more from a CRAI. Villain bets any Q and any J in that situation, and pot-commits himself, forcing him to call a push. When you filter in those other hands, you're sitting quite pretty. Even if villain is clever enough to check behind with a draw, you can still profitably check/call a river bet up to all-in knowing that your displayed weakness will increase his betting range wide enough to make it +EV.

Face it: hero's hand is rather weak here. The pot is protected, so forcing out weaker hands doesn't help tremendously. This seems like a grit-your-teeth situation where you're going to go to the mat, but you have to make sure your opponent comes along for the ride. I like a "check/push turn, check/call river" line.

In general, I'd want the side pot to be much larger before I'd start playing aggressively with a naked overpair. If he wants to get frisky, I'll give him action, but if he checks it down that's OK by me.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-01-2007, 05:59 PM
chesspain chesspain is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Southern New Hampshire
Posts: 8,277
Default Re: NL50: Maximizing EV with KK after one player is all-in?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
IMO open shove turn is superiour to checking.

[/ QUOTE ]

You can't open-shove the turn, though....the active pot has only $1 in it. What calls this bet that chesspain beats? Maybe a heart draw, but even there villain's not getting proper odds. Probably AQ calls. Other than that, nada. Given the preflop raise that got called, we can rule out most Q's and J's as likely possibilities. Villain should know that we're not betting into this pot unimproved because it's protected and we'd stand to win nothing. I think that against an open-push villain's calling range beats ours: hands like QQ, JJ, 66 that have us drawing nearly dead, hands like QJs that have us drawing quite thin, and hands like A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] x[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] that have 12 outs against us. You have to throw in a heapin' helpin' of AQ/AJ before this becomes a +EV push.

Now, if you check you stand to win CONSIDERABLY more from a CRAI. Villain bets any Q and any J in that situation, and pot-commits himself, forcing him to call a push. When you filter in those other hands, you're sitting quite pretty. Even if villain is clever enough to check behind with a draw, you can still profitably check/call a river bet up to all-in knowing that your displayed weakness will increase his betting range wide enough to make it +EV.

Face it: hero's hand is rather weak here. The pot is protected, so forcing out weaker hands doesn't help tremendously. This seems like a grit-your-teeth situation where you're going to go to the mat, but you have to make sure your opponent comes along for the ride. I like a "check/push turn, check/call river" line.

In general, I'd want the side pot to be much larger before I'd start playing aggressively with a naked overpair. If he wants to get frisky, I'll give him action, but if he checks it down that's OK by me.

[/ QUOTE ]

I like your analysis...especially because you swam against the tide to agree with my play. [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

As for the rest of the hand, the HJ called my all-in. Whereas I was ahead of the short-stack's KJo, the HJ tabled AA [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]...and I failed to hit what was actually a one-outer.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.