Hacker Attack (All Info Game Thread - Feb 19 Start)

[xorbie]

i'm assuming we are not allowed to peek ourselves?

[econophile]

[ QUOTE ]
i'm assuming we are not allowed to peek ourselves?

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
Furthermore, you may NOT peek yourself.

[/ QUOTE ]

[soah]

yeah I was gonna ask some witty questions too but I'll let xorbie handle it instead

[Zurvan]

FCBL

[HerbieGRD]

TruFloridaGator

[Neil S]

[ QUOTE ]
i'm assuming we are not allowed to peek ourselves?

[/ QUOTE ]I'm pretty sure we can't.

[kbar13]

[ QUOTE ]
i'm assuming we are not allowed to peek ourselves?

[/ QUOTE ]


[ QUOTE ]
Peeks ALWAYS result in either "good" or "evil" (normal or rogue NSA agent), and nothing else.

[/ QUOTE ]


Don't know how much good it will do, sounds like we don't find out what type of seer anyone is upon peek.

[Neil S]

If we could peek ourselves, it would give us a known data point for figuring out what kind we are, though. Likewise peeking someone twice, with the result re-randed if appropriate, would be handy.

So the rules prevent both tricks, meaning I expect it'll be at least 3, 4 days before anyone can be confident of their type.

[DustinG]

I think it might be best if we just peek who we think might be getting lynched in the next few days. We aren't going to have any useful information until we can start putting peeks together with lynches, and if we all peek different people than that assures that we get the least amount of information about who is useful. But its still going to take at least 2, and possibly 3 or more lynches of people that we have seen before we can figure anything out about ourselves.

[chuckleslovakian]

Well I was playing poker, but I raised preflop with KK just to have some idiot call with 28o and have the flop be 289. Running bad is getting old.
On that note Durron